ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
There are plenty of multicultural and multireligious majority Muslim places. None of them have hardly anything to do with the conflict in Israel/Palestine, other than a few periphery, knock-on effects.
Oh, they have something to do with Israel/Palestine.

Imagine being dishonest enough to pretend otherwise.

69h7wv5gb3ub1.jpg
 
It was easy to tell who the Patriots were, even without the flag. They're the ones who resemble normal college students instead of a collection of hideous looking women and soy boys.

Why is it that those with negative social market value and/or mental health issues gravitate to the Far Left?
 
It was easy to tell who the Patriots were, even without the flag. They're the ones who resemble normal college students instead of a collection of hideous looking women and soy boys.

Why is it that those with negative social market value and/or mental health issues gravitate to the Far Left?

Why, also, is it that all the ones protesting are wearing masks?

Are they still afraid of covid (🤣), or afraid of being identified because they know in their hearts they are LARPing on the wrong side of history, as dion likes to say?
 
Oh, they have something to do with Israel/Palestine.

Imagine being dishonest enough to pretend otherwise.

69h7wv5gb3ub1.jpg
That's just the Middle East. There are Muslim places all over the world. And linking those dates and numbers directly contradicts the point you're trying to make. You were trying to say Muslims had prejudice against Jews and oppressed them. As you can see right there with your own diagram, no they obviously didn't. They lived peacefully side by side for centuries. Until the Jews violently founded Israel, killings thousands and expelling many thousands more. Their neighbors then responded in kind. They weren't just being antisemitic because they're Muslim.
 
That's just the Middle East. There are Muslim places all over the world. And linking those dates and numbers directly contradicts the point you're trying to make. You were trying to say Muslims had prejudice against Jews and oppressed them. As you can see right there with your own diagram, no they obviously didn't. They lived peacefully side by side for centuries. Until the Jews violently founded Israel, killings thousands and expelling many thousands more. Their neighbors then responded in kind. They weren't just being antisemitic because they're Muslim.
I think it was Winston Churchill who once said “Muslims are very concerned about minority rights when they’re in the minority. When Muslims are in the majority, there are no minority rights.”
 
Neither Israel nor any of the neighboring Islamic countries deserve the time of day. All of them are corrupt at a fundamental level and it starts with religion.

There will be many wars long after this current one ends.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: vhcat70
You were trying to say Muslims had prejudice against Jews and oppressed them.
Yes, I’m totally the only one saying that. Not the people at Columbia kneeling towards Mecca while they shout for Jewish blood.

They lived peacefully side by side for centuries.
What nonsense. It’s beneath a response. The only reason I’ll even reply is to make sure everybody else who reads this understands fully: Non-Muslims could either convert or face death in many places. In others they paid a tax to receive state protection. Even now, in 2024 Muslims are killing Jews and Christians in Africa and Asia.
 
How is it that the guys here on the right can discuss substantive issues and disagree, amd still agree we need fundamental change in this country's direction, amd the leftists we have (mostly Dion and The Village Idiot, sam) are basically 100% lockstep with every idiotic destructive ideology possible?

How is it even real? How absolutely mindfvcked do you need to be to believe the way they do?

I do agree with SOME of dions more libertarian policies, but those are just because he likes to get high and such.

The Village Idiot on the other hand, is just that.
 
How is it that the guys here on the right can discuss substantive issues and disagree, amd still agree we need fundamental change in this country's direction, amd the leftists we have (mostly Dion and The Village Idiot, sam) are basically 100% lockstep with every idiotic destructive ideology possible?

How is it even real? How absolutely mindfvcked do you need to be to believe the way they do?

I do agree with SOME of dions more libertarian policies, but those are just because he likes to get high and such.

The Village Idiot on the other hand, is just that.

IMO, Sambortion just likes to pull your chain. Not really stupid as he lets on. For example, these are Trump voters rioting. Thats just lunacy that no one believes. He's trolling.

DSus is a commie. I have nothing in common with him. He is Antifa.

Don't forget Mab and Jusslies32.
 
IMO, Sambortion just likes to pull your chain. Not really stupid as he lets on. For example, these are Trump voters rioting. Thats just lunacy that no one believes. He's trolling.

DSus is a commie. I have nothing in common with him. He is Antifa.

Don't forget Mab and Jusslies32.
Sam really is that dumb. If he was just trolling, he wouldn't have also mentioned Capitol rioters, which, for one day, actually DID involve Trump voters. My guess is that the stupid idiot saw something on Twitter about the counter-protest at UNC, mistook it for a riot, and stupidly assumed that all the campus insanity is another "January 6".
 
What was obvious in the 1890’s has been forgotten in the idiocies of progressivism.

“It is, thank heaven, difficult if not impossible for the modern European to fully appreciate the force which fanaticism exercises among an ignorant, warlike and Oriental population. Several generations have elapsed since the nations of the West have drawn the sword in religious controversy, and the evil memories of the gloomy past have soon faded in the strong, clear light of Rationalism and human sympathy. Indeed it is evident that Christianity, however degraded and distorted by cruelty and intolerance, must always exert a modifying influence on men's passions, and protect them from the more violent forms of fanatical fever, as we are protected from smallpox by vaccination.

But the Mohammadan religion increases, instead of lessening, the fury of intolerance. It was originally propagated by the sword, and ever since, its votaries have been subject, above the people of all other creeds, to this form of madness. In a moment the fruits of patient toil, the prospects of material prosperity, the fear of death itself, are flung aside. The more emotional Pathans are powerless to resist. All rational considerations are forgotten. Seizing their weapons, they become Ghazis—as dangerous and as sensible as mad dogs: fit only to be treated as such. While the more generous spirits among the tribesmen become convulsed in an ecstasy of religious bloodthirstiness, poorer and more material souls derive additional impulses from the influence of others, the hopes of plunder and the joy of fighting. Thus whole nations are roused to arms. Thus the Turks repel their enemies, the Arabs of the Sudan break the British squares, and the rising on the Indian frontier spreads far and wide. In each case civilisation is confronted with militant Mahommedanism. The forces of progress clash with those of reaction. The religion of blood and war is face to face with that of peace. Luckily the religion of peace is usually the better armed.”
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT