No kidding. So should the city pick up that entire check and for how much? $25 billion? Obviously not. $50? Obviously. In between? Maybe commission smart people to examine what has actually happened in multiple cities around the country to see whether there is a net gain, then apply those lessons to the individual circumstances at issue. Anecdotes and gross gains do not tell the whole tale. And the whole tale is that there is scant evidence for net gains from stadium deals, where cities pick up the tab, billionaires (or hundred millionaires) make a ton, and local businesses benefit some but not enough to justify the public expenditure. No one is arguing that a stadium or arena is a bad thing on its own. They are arguing that public money spent on such stadiums that primarily benefit the insanely wealthy team owners is not justified by the increased local revenues.
Already stated in my first post I didn't agree with public money being spent on stadiums.