It's the statistic that matters to me the most. Given a single choice among the many metrics we lead, it's the one I would want to hold onto. It feels good to be referenced as the "all-time winningest program".
Only the other Blue Bloods (UNC and KU) and Duke (not a blue blood) are factored in as ever having a chance to catch us (in my lifetime anyway).
We have been behind by as much as 176 wins (1925-26) and ahead by as many as 61 wins (1978-79). Currently we are ahead of KU (+16), UNC (+43), and Duke (+117).
We have held the all-time wins distinction from 1959-60 (taking it away from KU) through 1987-88 and since 1993-94 (from UNC).
Of the many stats we lead in, what is most important to you?
Only the other Blue Bloods (UNC and KU) and Duke (not a blue blood) are factored in as ever having a chance to catch us (in my lifetime anyway).
We have been behind by as much as 176 wins (1925-26) and ahead by as many as 61 wins (1978-79). Currently we are ahead of KU (+16), UNC (+43), and Duke (+117).
We have held the all-time wins distinction from 1959-60 (taking it away from KU) through 1987-88 and since 1993-94 (from UNC).
Of the many stats we lead in, what is most important to you?