Interesting if true...
https://bleacherreport.com/articles...-asked-recruiters-for-a-job-money-and-housing
https://bleacherreport.com/articles...-asked-recruiters-for-a-job-money-and-housing
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He’s already on suicide watch,Dick Vitale might hang himself if the phonies in durham did give him what he wanted and get caught
What do you mean when you say "slurped" ?It's incredible how much the media and the NCAA have slurped Duke in the past. I hope that changes, but I'm not foolish enough to think it will.
I think you know what I mean.What do you mean when you say "slurped" ?
There’s no chance a player like Zion is up for sale and he goes to Duke for free, whoever got him bought him. Dukes surge in recruiting was nothing more than illegal benefits, probably a mixed bag of buying some players with some that weren’t paid.
That’s a different scenario as you yourself pointed out, there’s proof Zion was asking. It takes the player asking, it doesn’t matter how many potential suitors would have offered. Under your example Wall would have been looking to get paid but just went to UK without anything, that’s never happening.I don't know if I would agree with that. I don't think we paid Wall, and you know there were people out there that would have been willing to give him stuff if he had asked. It could be that he was offered without asking, or other players may have been that ended up here. That fact alone does not mean the team that gets said player is dirty. There has to be more than that.
There’s no chance a player like Zion is up for sale and he goes to Duke for free, whoever got him bought him. Dukes surge in recruiting was nothing more than illegal benefits, probably a mixed bag of buying some players with some that weren’t paid.
Hate duke. Freely admit it. My guess is duke thru it’s alumni have managed to become the best at getting improper benefits to players and their families. Perhaps the basketball program is not directly involved but they are certainly the benefactor.
Allows the program to claim plausible deniability and the holier than thou attitude of saint K
I don't understand something. The article said Williamson's name became involved in that trial, but later it says that the conversation about him was not admitted into evidence. Huh?
And the person to navigate those waters was probably Capel who is now gone, and coincidentally they seem to be struggling relative to what they have been doing the last few years.
The thing that makes me laugh is how are jurors supposed to forget what they just saw and heard?
But the defense presented some of that evidence ... not all of it and the judge said nope not allowed.
Yea, why would you want Kansas to pay you, but not Duke? Defies logic. Good post.