It’s like the one reasonable winter sport that could have evolved from an actual activity. Well, except for the canal ice skating in Amsterdam.Hunters in Norway
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It’s like the one reasonable winter sport that could have evolved from an actual activity. Well, except for the canal ice skating in Amsterdam.Hunters in Norway
There's hotter curlers posted in this thread.Those Canadien curlers are closer to hot than not and the Gold Standard for curlers from Canada is Cheryl Bernard...
Yeah, I did right after it posted. Swung and missed on that oneYou want to try and read that again, sugar?
Our men's curling team is garbage. The captain of the team has cost them a couple of games with his poor throws. Pretty much eliminated from moving on.
As far as female athletes go, the Canuck chick curling team is fairly do-able, especially the 2nd curler from the left AND NO I AINT NECESSARILY SAYING THEYRE HOT IM JUST SAYING THAT ON A GOOD NIGHT MOST OF THEM WOULD WORK.
4/3, 1, 3/2, 2/3
2,1,4,3
Dammit JKBA you know the rules. Here, YWIA.Silje Norendal = smoke show.
/threadDammit JKBA you know the rules. Here, YWIA.
And yes, she is pure smoke.
So by my calculations, Norway now has won a medal for 200,000 citizens, while the USA has won a medal for every 34,000,000 citizens. That makes them 170 times more successful at winter Olympic sports.
What is the deal with these Scandinavian countries being so good? Are they just use to snowy conditions more than we are and better environments to perfect their skills in? Do they have to put on a pair of skis to just go to the grocery store? Do they tell their kids that when they were their age they had to cross country ski uphill both ways to school and back?
We have some of the best facilities and athletes in the world, but are struggling big time on pretty much anything not trick related. I hope we have some events coming up where we can rack up some medals.
As a guy who grew up in Northern Ontario, I can say that winters, even in the northern states, aren’t winters in nearly the sense that I was exposed to and not close to what Northern European countries have. Winter back home was mid October to mid April. That’s a lot of extra time to train in real winter conditions.
These are rich people sports in the US. They’re just regular people sports in the countries that are good at them. Jontavious isn’t picking up a lift ticket on a Wednesday afternoon or we’d be winning urrthing.What is the deal with these Scandinavian countries being so good? Are they just use to snowy conditions more than we are and better environments to perfect their skills in? Do they have to put on a pair of skis to just go to the grocery store? Do they tell their kids that when they were their age they had to cross country ski uphill both ways to school and back?
We have some of the best facilities and athletes in the world, but are struggling big time on pretty much anything not trick related. I hope we have some events coming up where we can rack up some medals.
Winter snob.As a guy who grew up in Northern Ontario, I can say that winters, even in the northern states, aren’t winters in nearly the sense that I was exposed to and not close to what Northern European countries have. Winter back home was mid October to mid April. That’s a lot of extra time to train in real winter conditions.
Norway kicks ass at Nordic sports. Who'd have thunk it?So by my calculations, Norway now has won a medal for 200,000 citizens, while the USA has won a medal for every 34,000,000 citizens. That makes them 170 times more successful at winter Olympic sports.
There are roughly as many people of Norwegian descent in Minnesota, Wisconsin, the Dakotas and elsewhere in the US as in Norway. And the U.S. has plenty of snow and ski runs.Norway kicks ass at Nordic sports. Who'd have thunk it?
You are probably correct, but Americans have other sports that are popular. Norway is mostly Nordic sports concentrated. The US is choking big time too though.There are roughly as many people of Norwegian descent in Minnesota, Wisconsin, the Dakotas and elsewhere in the US as in Norway. And the U.S. has plenty of snow and ski runs.
The U.S. Olympians are just choking big time.
This must be why nobody from Norway wants to come here.
Dammit JKBA you know the rules. Here, YWIA.
And yes, she is pure smoke.
I think it is the attitude in the US of "Do the commercial first, then win the medal..." When it comes time to actually perform, the hunger and focus and joy of winning is replaced by the pressure of justifying the huge endorsement contracts. As for the argument that countries like Norway are more culturally attuned to winter, that's true enough. But this is Big Business, and no one spends the money, has the facilities or gives athletes the advantages of the US. From an AP story I saw about the US debacle (so far): "The U.S. runs an extensive winter training program with millions of dollars spent every year to train top athletes just for this occasion. The U.S. Olympic Committee took in more than $300 million in 2016 alone, with a big chunk of that used to train elite athletes."You are probably correct, but Americans have other sports that are popular. Norway is mostly Nordic sports concentrated. The US is choking big time too though.
Bobsled teams were embarrassing last night.
I think it is the attitude in the US of "Do the commercial first, then win the medal..." When it comes time to actually perform, the hunger and focus and joy of winning is replaced by the pressure of justifying the huge endorsement contracts. As for the argument that countries like Norway are more culturally attuned to winter, that's true enough. But this is Big Business, and no one spends the money, has the facilities or gives athletes the advantages of the US. From an AP story I saw about the US debacle (so far): "The U.S. runs an extensive winter training program with millions of dollars spent every year to train top athletes just for this occasion. The U.S. Olympic Committee took in more than $300 million in 2016 alone, with a big chunk of that used to train elite athletes."
I think it is the attitude in the US of "Do the commercial first, then win the medal..." When it comes time to actually perform, the hunger and focus and joy of winning is replaced by the pressure of justifying the huge endorsement contracts. As for the argument that countries like Norway are more culturally attuned to winter, that's true enough. But this is Big Business, and no one spends the money, has the facilities or gives athletes the advantages of the US. From an AP story I saw about the US debacle (so far): "The U.S. runs an extensive winter training program with millions of dollars spent every year to train top athletes just for this occasion. The U.S. Olympic Committee took in more than $300 million in 2016 alone, with a big chunk of that used to train elite athletes."
I always find these sorts of things intriguing. Same as abandoned theme parks. So much money just flushed.(Long post)
I was curious how much it actually cost South Korea to host the Winter Olympics and found out it was $13 billion. That is 2nd most ever for a Winter Olympics behind the $54 billion Russia spent for it in Sochi. It was estimated at $7 billion when they were trying to become the host city, but ended up nearly double that. They spent over $100 million just on the stadium that hosts the opening and closing ceremonies and likely will tear it down after 4 uses from what I read.
Hosting the Olympics is getting so costly that many cities are dropping out of the chance to host it. Some go into major debt over hosting them. Many of the facilities are demolished or left abandoned afterwards. Here are a few pictures of some of them.
Sarajevo bobsled track
Sarajevo ski jump
Beijing beach volleyball facility
Athens canoe and kayak facility
Athens softball stadium
Rio aquatic stadium
Rio golf course
Just a few examples I found with plenty more out there. Doesn't include the buildings that were demolished afterwards as well. It sure doesn't seem like these host cities think this stuff out very well in advance. At least Sarajevo had the excuse of war that probably contributed to their facilities being neglected.
Everything that is built should have a repurpose for it afterwards. Like Atlanta moving the Braves to the new stadium. They could probably turn other facilities into pro sports facilities or maybe let major colleges nearby use them. The aquatic places could be turned into water parks. They could make housing (apartments/condos) out of the buildings used for the athletes and tourists to stay in during the Olympics.
They must all be banking on the economies of the cities taking off during and after the Olympics. South Korea hasn't sold as many tickets as they had expected and they just aren't a country I see with a large amount of tourists visiting. Being next to North Korea probably doesn't make them as attractive of a vacation destination. I wouldn't be surprised if in the future they only have a few different countries host the Olympics and just keep reusing facilities.
I always find these sorts of things intriguing. Same as abandoned theme parks. So much money just flushed.
So one of the medalists in Curling (how in the hell is that a "sport", I don't see Darts or Bowling in the Summer Olympics yet) has been banned for "doping". Really! A Curler needs to dope for performance enhancement?
Curling looks like a cold climate version of softball - a sport that's more fun if you're drinking.So one of the medalists in Curling (how in the hell is that a "sport", I don't see Darts or Bowling in the Summer Olympics yet) has been banned for "doping". Really! A Curler needs to dope for performance enhancement?
Curling looks like a cold climate version of softball - a sport that's more fun if you're drinking.
I actually looked at joining a local Curling club just for a side-hobby, as it kind of looks like a drinking game anyways. Sure enough, in looking at photos of the club online:
They make a hell of a difference. I can only talk about skis, and not a whole lot about that.
Ski wax can determine how easily a ski can glide across the snow. There are different types of ski wax so you need the right type for the conditions.
There are equipment limitations that I didn't know about until the commentator mentioned it last night. The more curvature the ski has along its sides, the easier it is to turn. There is a limitation to how much curvature a ski can have. This can make a tremendous difference in slalom events, not so much in a downhill or Super-G.
There are rules on how slalom courses must be set up. Skiers from other countries have complained that the Austrians have too much influence in the course setups. Austrians win most of the medals in alpine skiing so it's not surprising.
Like any other sport, they want the person to decide the outcome rather than the technology.
I curled a few dozen times as a teenager/young adult back home. It's hard as shit. Getting that rock to do what you want it to, all while controlling the speed and distance along with having to maneuver around other rocks on the sheet, is damn near impossible. For that reason, I'd say most recreational players see it as an occasion to hang out with buddies, put down some beers, and have fun doing something different.