ADVERTISEMENT

Why would Kansas sign mostly 4-star freshmen?

So, here you have a program in Kansas that is currently at the top of CBB. You can argue about which of a couple of programs is “the” top program, but it doesn’t matter. As well as any program, I think Kansas can get in the door with anybody they want to recruit and, if they want, get commitments from 5-star high schoolers on a level with anybody.

So, for the last few years why have they been focusing on players not ranked as high and often talented projectable 4-star recruits (sometimes even outside the Top 100)? Is it a strategy connected to the Transfer Portal? Is it because they can no longer attract 5-star high school kids? And if it’s part of a planned approach, is it wise?

My guess is the plan assumes most Kansas 4-star freshman recruits come in understanding the need to develop and be more patient than one-year. Therefore, Kansas ends up with a carry-over base from year to year. Some of those recruits develop into very good college players, while some won’t work out as well and will transfer in their Junior year. Then Kansas identifies the top transfers and adds 2-3 of those. Meanwhile, the 4 or so incoming freshmen mostly provide depth and learn on the job.
In today's college basketball you have to get and retain players for 3 or 4 years. The difference between most 4 and 5 stars can be publicity. Most 5 stars have ego's, people whispering in their ear, and are going to jump to the NBA after one year. Most 4 stars are more grounded, coming willing to work and learn, hopefully value an college education and will grow into a team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: G-PIP and KFuqua
Because it’s extremely rare to have great success with mainly freshmen running the show (even if they’re the best freshmen).
 
  • Like
Reactions: KFuqua
But they do stick around longer at KU.

Every year they seem to have guys leading the team that have come up through their program.

-Jalen Wilson - ranked 51st in 2019, needs no introduction. Won a title.

-Ochai Agbaji played 4 years at KU and by the time he was a senior, was good enough to lead them to a title.

-Christian Braun played at KU 3 years, won a title and is playing big minutes in the NBA playoffs

-David McCormack: rated 30th in 2018, played 4 years at KU

-Dujuan Harris, played 4 years at KU, won a title

-Mitch Lightfoot, played 6 years at KU, won a title

-KJ Adams, played 2 years, was rated 66 in 2021, like everyone else on this list, won a title.

This is a list gathered from just the last couple season, how many guys has UK had stay more than 2 years? Most of these dudes were 3 and 4 star kids that Self developed.

Same thing with Baylor's 2021 team, Nova's two title teams, uNC's 2017 title team, UVA's 2019 title team and on and on and on.
You're right, absolutely why Self had success with each of these players and devised a roster primed to win a title. But here's the thing, how many of those guys would've stuck around if the transfer portal was as active 4 years ago as it has been the last 2 years?

You mentioned several 4-year players that were a part of that team. Seriously, how many of them would've stuck around if the portal was what it is today. Another poster already pointed out how many of their recent recruits have hit the portal these last few recruiting classes.

I just wonder if he'll be able to win another title if he tries to use that same format. The portal taketh, and the portal taketh A LOT
 
They are trying to get the top recruit this year too lol. He is still going after top guys that's the point, maybe he has struck out the last couple of years but doesn't mean he hasn't tried.
Right, but again, where did the OP say Self doesn't recruit 5* kids? Look at the thread title, he said the word "mostly".

If you're going to recruit one-and-done kids with the idea that they need to be ready to compete right away, you better get top shelf 5* kids. Looks to me like Self is doing what you should do if winning in college is your goal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KFuqua
Now look at Calipari. It's crazy.


14 offers in 2020
14 offers in 2021
9 offers in 2022
10 offers in 2023


47 offers to 5-stars in the past 4 seasons. 11 have signed.
 

Last 4 seasons. 13 5-stars recruited.

They are trying to sign 5-stars. Just haven't been successful.
Yeah, if you look at those offers, they pretty much offer at least one, and usually 2 of the top 3 guys at each position every year and usually the top player at each position. It's worked out well for him, but he has 100% tried to get the top guys and just hasn't had success.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: kyjeff1
They tried to get Zion clearly, lol!
Not sure why you keep ending your posts with "lol". You're the one that is wrong.

Again, the OP didn't say KU ONLY recruits 4 stars, he said "mostly".

Of course KU tried to recruit Zion, why wouldn't they? Adding Zion to a team of 4* juniors and seniors and you have a title contender. Isn't that the goal?


lol
 
Duke:

9 offers in 2020
7 offers in 2021
7 offers in 2022
8 offers in 2023


Very high. Still not on Coach Cal's pace.


Duke has signed 15 of the 31 they've offered. Very successful at recruiting. Just haven't won the title with any of them.
 
You're right, absolutely why Self had success with each of these players and devised a roster primed to win a title. But here's the thing, how many of those guys would've stuck around if the transfer portal was as active 4 years ago as it has been the last 2 years?

You mentioned several 4-year players that were a part of that team. Seriously, how many of them would've stuck around if the portal was what it is today. Another poster already pointed out how many of their recent recruits have hit the portal these last few recruiting classes.

I just wonder if he'll be able to win another title if he tries to use that same format. The portal taketh, and the portal taketh A LOT
Yeah, they had players transfer out recently, but they're still putting out veteran lineups with multiple players that have developed within their program.
 

Last 4 seasons. 13 5-stars recruited.

They are trying to sign 5-stars. Just haven't been successful.
Right, but Self isn't just throwing a blanket over every kid that has 5 stars next to his name. He's offereing the top shelf kids, ones that are polished and can contribute right away.

To me, that is the best way to build a roster. Take the kids you have developed, add the best, most polished, top shelf 5* kids and add a transfer or two.

This is what Cal should be doing, but he's not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JHannibalSmith
So, here you have a program in Kansas that is currently at the top of CBB. You can argue about which of a couple of programs is “the” top program, but it doesn’t matter. As well as any program, I think Kansas can get in the door with anybody they want to recruit and, if they want, get commitments from 5-star high schoolers on a level with anybody.

So, for the last few years why have they been focusing on players not ranked as high and often talented projectable 4-star recruits (sometimes even outside the Top 100)? Is it a strategy connected to the Transfer Portal? Is it because they can no longer attract 5-star high school kids? And if it’s part of a planned approach, is it wise?

My guess is the plan assumes most Kansas 4-star freshman recruits come in understanding the need to develop and be more patient than one-year. Therefore, Kansas ends up with a carry-over base from year to year. Some of those recruits develop into very good college players, while some won’t work out as well and will transfer in their Junior year. Then Kansas identifies the top transfers and adds 2-3 of those. Meanwhile, the 4 or so incoming freshmen mostly provide depth and learn on the job.

Transfer portal have been the main players. 4-star recruits have been the supporting cast & then mostly transferring from Kanas to another school afterwards.
 
  • Like
Reactions: G-PIP
Right, but again, where did the OP say Self doesn't recruit 5* kids? Look at the thread title, he said the word "mostly".

If you're going to recruit one-and-done kids with the idea that they need to be ready to compete right away, you better get top shelf 5* kids. Looks to me like Self is doing what you should do if winning in college is your goal.
Here is the problem with what the OP says...over the past 5 years, Kansas has blown away the competition with 5 star offers:

5 star offers by year according to 247 sports over the past 5 years:

2019
KU - 23 offers
UK - 13 offers
Duke - 9 offers
UNC - 11 offers

2020
KU - 12 offers
UK - 14 offers
Duke - 9 offers
UNC - 11 offers
2021
KU - 13 offers
UK - 14 offers
Duke - 7 offers
UNC - 9 offers
2022
KU - 18 offers
UK - 9 offers
Duke - 7 offers
UNC - 8 offers
2023
KU - 16 offers
UK - 10 offers
Duke - 8 offers
UNC - 6 offers

OVERALL
KU - 82 offers
UK - 60 offers
UNC - 45 offers
Duke - 40 offers
 
Right, but Self isn't just throwing a blanket over every kid that has 5 stars next to his name. He's offereing the top shelf kids, ones that are polished and can contribute right away.

To me, that is the best way to build a roster. Take the kids you have developed, add the best, most polished, top shelf 5* kids and add a transfer or two.

This is what Cal should be doing, but he's not.

Most of Self's recruits eventually transfer as he pulls from portal over them.

Take away 2022 & Self is very underwhelming with 3-4 times the 1st & 2nd round exits from the tourney that Cal has.
 
Here is the problem with what the OP says...over the past 5 years, Kansas has blown away the competition with 5 star offers:

5 star offers by year according to 247 sports over the past 5 years:

2019
KU - 23 offers
UK - 13 offers
Duke - 9 offers
UNC - 11 offers

2020
KU - 12 offers
UK - 14 offers
Duke - 9 offers
UNC - 11 offers
2021
KU - 13 offers
UK - 14 offers
Duke - 7 offers
UNC - 9 offers
2022
KU - 18 offers
UK - 9 offers
Duke - 7 offers
UNC - 8 offers
2023
KU - 16 offers
UK - 10 offers
Duke - 8 offers
UNC - 6 offers

OVERALL
KU - 82 offers
UK - 60 offers
UNC - 45 offers
Duke - 40 offers

Shhhh....you're destroying the false narratives by the shallow thinkers.
 
Here is the problem with what the OP says...over the past 5 years, Kansas has blown away the competition with 5 star offers:

5 star offers by year according to 247 sports over the past 5 years:

2019
KU - 23 offers
UK - 13 offers
Duke - 9 offers
UNC - 11 offers

2020
KU - 12 offers
UK - 14 offers
Duke - 9 offers
UNC - 11 offers
2021
KU - 13 offers
UK - 14 offers
Duke - 7 offers
UNC - 9 offers
2022
KU - 18 offers
UK - 9 offers
Duke - 7 offers
UNC - 8 offers
2023
KU - 16 offers
UK - 10 offers
Duke - 8 offers
UNC - 6 offers

OVERALL
KU - 82 offers
UK - 60 offers
UNC - 45 offers
Duke - 40 offers
Right, but in the thread title, he said "mostly signs", not "offers".

I'm sure Self realizes he's not going to get every player he offers, he's probably only going to get 1 or 2, if that, but if those guys are top shelf kids, he has a winner and when you look at KU's performance on the court over the last 10 years, it proves what he's doing, is working.
 
Shhhh....you're destroying the false narratives by the shallow thinkers.
Exactly, Kansas doesn't have some grand formula, they want as many 5 stars as possible just like UK. If they don't then they do a very good job at filling out the roster, better than UK.
 
Most of Self's recruits eventually transfer as he pulls from portal over them.

Take away 2022 & Self is very underwhelming with 3-4 times the 1st & 2nd round exits from the tourney that Cal has.
KU had a few early exits back 10-13 years ago, but in the modern era, they most certainly have not had more 1st and 2nd round exits.

You said "3-4 times the 1st & 2nd round exits", that's hilarious considering Cal didn't even make the tournament in 2021, lost in the 1st round in '22 and lost in the 2nd round in '23. So, by your math, that means KU has lost in the first or 2nd round 9-12 times the last 3 years. Do you want to go ahead and redo your figures???

They have been outperforming us head to head, in the regular season, in conference play, in the all time wins race and in the NCAAT.

I'm not sure what you're watching, but it’s not what the rest of us are watching.
 
Shhhh....you're destroying the false narratives by the shallow thinkers.
Except you’re the one that is wrong. Read the freaking thread title. The OP didn't say anything about how many 4 and 5 star kids they 'offered' and he didn't say anything about Self ONLY offering 4* kids, he literally said "… mostly signs 4* kids".

I'm not sure why this is so hard for so many people to understand.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: crawfords corner
Right, but in the thread title, he said "mostly signs", not "offers".

I'm sure Self realizes he's not going to get every player he offers, he's probably only going to get 1 or 2, if that, but if those guys are top shelf kids, he has a winner and when you look at KU's performance on the court over the last 10 years, it proves what he's doing, is working.
The premise of the conversation is around him wanting 4 star guys because they stick around longer, wait their turn, etc. The OP wrote in his post, "So, for the last few years why have they been focusing on players not ranked as high and often talented projectable 4-star recruits". In fact, he really wants 5 star guys by the amount that he has offered, he has just had issues getting them. Now, it's worked out in his favor, but the OP's point was that he has been focusing on 4 stars when he truly hasn't.
 
KU had a few early exits back 10-13 years ago, but in the modern era, they most certainly have not had more 1st and 2nd round exits.

You said "3-4 times the 1st & 2nd round exits", that's hilarious considering Cal didn't even make the tournament in 2021, lost in the 1st round in '22 and lost in the 2nd round in '23. So, by your math, that means KU has lost in the first or 2nd round 9-12 times the last 3 years. Do you want to go ahead and redo your figures???

They have been outperforming us head to head, in the regular season, in conference play, in the all time wins race and in the NCAAT.

I'm not sure what you're watching, but it’s not what the rest of us are watching.

Self has:
-19 NCAA tournament appearances

-2 National Championships: 2008, 2022

-4 final 4's in 19 seasons at KU
**2018, 2022 most recent

-Lost 1st game: 2 times
**2005, 2006

-Lost 2nd game: 6 times
2010, 2014, 2015, 2019, 2021, 2023

**8 of his 19 tournament appearances at Kansas he has lost the 1st or 2nd game.

So, I'll ask you what you've asked me:what have you been watching?

Self winning it all in 2022 changes "perception".
 
Last edited:
So, here you have a program in Kansas that is currently at the top of CBB. You can argue about which of a couple of programs is “the” top program, but it doesn’t matter. As well as any program, I think Kansas can get in the door with anybody they want to recruit and, if they want, get commitments from 5-star high schoolers on a level with anybody.

So, for the last few years why have they been focusing on players not ranked as high and often talented projectable 4-star recruits (sometimes even outside the Top 100)? Is it a strategy connected to the Transfer Portal? Is it because they can no longer attract 5-star high school kids? And if it’s part of a planned approach, is it wise?

My guess is the plan assumes most Kansas 4-star freshman recruits come in understanding the need to develop and be more patient than one-year. Therefore, Kansas ends up with a carry-over base from year to year. Some of those recruits develop into very good college players, while some won’t work out as well and will transfer in their Junior year. Then Kansas identifies the top transfers and adds 2-3 of those. Meanwhile, the 4 or so incoming freshmen mostly provide depth and learn on the job.
That speaks to how bad the culture is in the UK BB program. As a result of Calipari, it's all about instant gratification in the hope the fives stars will help cover Cal's lack of ability to develop players over time. Bill Self recruits kids to his system and prepares them to succeed.
 
In 2020 Cal had the number 1 class with 2 5* and 4 4*, on paper it was the perfect blend of players, we all know how that turned out. Cal also signed what many thought was the top portal center in Sarr. I don't think there is any magic formula, I guarantee Kansas would have taken that UK class all day and traded their class with UK 100 out of 100 times.
 
Self has:
-19 NCAA tournament appearances

-2 National Championships: 2008, 2022

-4 final 4's in 19 seasons at KU
**2018, 2022 most recent

-Lost 1st game: 2 times
**2005, 2006

-Lost 2nd game: 6 times
2010, 2014, 2015, 2019, 2021, 2023

**8 of his 19 tournament appearances at Kansas he has lost the 1st or 2nd game.

So, I'll ask you what you've asked me:what have you been watching?

Self winning it all in 2022 changes "perception".
First of all, Self wasn't coaching in the NCAAT this year, so their 2nd round loss isn't on him.

That brings his total down to 7 total 1st or 2nd round losses since 2005.

If we use the 2009-10 season (Cal's first year here), Self has a total of 5 first weekend exits (no first round losses and no missed tournaments).

In that same time frame, Cal has 1 first round exit, one 2nd round exit, one NIT and one historically bad season where he only won 9 games and couldn't even qualify for the CBI tournament. That's 4 first weekent exits/NCAAT/NIT misses.

In what world does 5 = "3 to 4 times more" than 4???

And I'll add a very obvious comment, Self has yet to miss the NCAAT. I would take 5 first weekend exits over 2 missed NCAAT's, a first round loss to a 15 seed and a 2nd round loss all day long.

Just admit you greatly exaggerated and were way off, we can move on once you do so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kujhawk001
In 2020 Cal had the number 1 class with 2 5* and 4 4*, on paper it was the perfect blend of players, we all know how that turned out. Cal also signed what many thought was the top portal center in Sarr. I don't think there is any magic formula, I guarantee Kansas would have taken that UK class all day and traded their class with UK 100 out of 100 times.
Yeah, the difference is, those four 4* players were being counted on to produce right away, at schools like KU, Baylor, 'Nova etc… , they are brought in to develop and eventually become top notch college basketball players.

Who's better, Jalen Wilson in year 4, or Devin Askew as a freshman? Askew was rated higher in HS, but which player did more for his team? Which coach's plan worked out better?
 
Yeah, the difference is, those four 4* players were being counted on to produce right away, at schools like KU, Baylor, 'Nova etc… , they are brought in to develop and eventually become top notch college basketball players.

Who's better, Jalen Wilson in year 4, or Devin Askew as a freshman? Askew was rated higher in HS, but which player did more for his team? Which coach's plan worked out better?
The 4 stars weren't really supposed to be that heavily relied on, Jackson was clearly better than expected (which is good) and Ware and Fletcher barely played, now Askew was a fringe 4/5 star and clearly he should not have played but Clarke getting hurt derailed his plan to let him run the point and we had Mintz but Cal was very stubborn in playing Askew, but nevertheless Cal's recruiting formula was excellent on paper that year. You should of had 4 4 stars coming back in 2022.
 
First of all, Self wasn't coaching in the NCAAT this year, so their 2nd round loss isn't on him.

That brings his total down to 7 total 1st or 2nd round losses since 2005.

If we use the 2009-10 season (Cal's first year here), Self has a total of 5 first weekend exits (no first round losses and no missed tournaments).

In that same time frame, Cal has 1 first round exit, one 2nd round exit, one NIT and one historically bad season where he only won 9 games and couldn't even qualify for the CBI tournament. That's 4 first weekent exits/NCAAT/NIT misses.

In what world does 5 = "3 to 4 times more" than 4???

And I'll add a very obvious comment, Self has yet to miss the NCAAT. I would take 5 first weekend exits over 2 missed NCAAT's, a first round loss to a 15 seed and a 2nd round loss all day long.

Just admit you greatly exaggerated and were way off, we can move on once you do so.

You're telling me going into the 2021-22 season 3 final 4's since 2004 & 1 national championship, 7 early exits as a #1 & 2 seed would be celebrated by you & UK fans..lol.

Cal has 4 final 4's, 1 national championship, 3 Elite 8's since 2010 & UK fans are ready to fire him...but you'd celebrate Self going into 2021-2022 season. Not even Kansas fans were celebrating him. Several were calling for change.

Outside of the covid season & 2012-13 when their best player on a thin team blew his knee out with 10 games...Cal has had teams capable of making a run.

In 11 tournament appearances at UK Cal has made it to at least the Elite 8, 7 times. 7 out of 11. That's better than any current coach.

Over the same period Self advanced to at least Elite 8, 6 times out of 13 tournaments. Stop making Self out to be John Wooden like. Good grief!
 
Uhh yeah, but to them, their definition of "very best players", are guys they know they can develope + a couple of difference makers that can step in and play right now.

Our definition of "very best players" is potential draft picks, guys that Cal only wants to stick around for 1 year and who can jump the highest.

If you were running a program, which method would you go with?
They must have the same definition of very best players, Self just struck out
 
You're telling me going into the 2021-22 season 3 final 4's since 2004 & 1 national championship, 7 early exits as a #1 & 2 seed would be celebrated by you & UK fans..lol.

Cal has 4 final 4's, 1 national championship, 3 Elite 8's since 2010 & UK fans are ready to fire him...but you'd celebrate Self going into 2021-2022 season. Not even Kansas fans were celebrating him. Several were calling for change.

Outside of the covid season & 2012-13 when their best player on a thin team blew his knee out with 10 games...Cal has had teams capable of making a run.

In 11 tournament appearances at UK Cal has made it to at least the Elite 8, 7 times. 7 out of 11. That's better than any current coach.

Over the same period Self advanced to at least Elite 8, 6 times out of 13 tournaments. Stop making Self out to be John Wooden like. Good grief!

And...since 2015 Self has advanced it Elite 8 - 4 times.

Cal has advanced to Elite 8 - 3 times since 2015.

2022 was the first time Self has advanced to the Elite 8 since 2018. Cal's last was 2019.
 
Last edited:
Signing multi year players and spending the Nil money on a few big time players a year is a strategy. Circling your few blue chips with solid players may or not payoff but it sure beats playing craps in the portal every year.

Personally Id rather have a solid core of veteran players and a few big time recruits vs all new all the time strategy.
 
Self has:
-19 NCAA tournament appearances

-2 National Championships: 2008, 2022

-4 final 4's in 19 seasons at KU
**2018, 2022 most recent

-Lost 1st game: 2 times
**2005, 2006

-Lost 2nd game: 6 times
2010, 2014, 2015, 2019, 2021, 2023

**8 of his 19 tournament appearances at Kansas he has lost the 1st or 2nd game.

So, I'll ask you what you've asked me:what have you been watching?

Self winning it all in 2022 changes "perception".

Grace, I don’t know which recruiting strategy is the best, and I think we can all find find things in our coaches that frustrate us at times. That said, I don’t know any real KU fans that were calling for a coaching change to replace Coach Self.

As far as his record is concerned, he has coached 18 NCAA tournaments as the KU head coach.
- 18 NCAA tournaments coached
- 9 Elite 8 appearances
- 4 Final Four appearances
- 2 National Championships
- The Covid year they were the overall #1 seed. Not they would have made it out of the first weekend, but is was a great year, with great potential to make a deep run.
- Won the conference championship like 17 times
- Won the conference tournament championship like 9 times.

Would it be nice to have a couple more Final Four appearances or another national championship? Absolutely, but like him or not, his level of consistency is unbelievable. And during his time at KU, built that record with considerably less talent as it relates to recruiting rankings than UK, Duke, and North Carolina.

Coach Self’s head to head record versus the top blue blood coaches during his time at KU is impressive as well.
- Coach Self vs Coach Cal at UK: 5-4
- Coach Self vs Coach K at Duke: 3-2
- Coach Self vs Coach Williams at UNC: I believe he is 3-0

I am not seeing an under achiever here. Personally, I am not looking forward to the day he retires and we have to replace him. That will be a tough act to follow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kujhawk001
It almost seems as if Cal buys an Athlons magazine and recruits off of that rag rather than evaluate talent himself. Self on the other hand evaluates by flying around the country and actually watches basketball games. BIG DIFFERENCE
 
Grace, I don’t know which recruiting strategy is the best, and I think we can all find find things in our coaches that frustrate us at times. That said, I don’t know any real KU fans that were calling for a coaching change to replace Coach Self.

As far as his record is concerned, he has coached 18 NCAA tournaments as the KU head coach.
- 18 NCAA tournaments coached
- 9 Elite 8 appearances
- 4 Final Four appearances
- 2 National Championships
- The Covid year they were the overall #1 seed. Not they would have made it out of the first weekend, but is was a great year, with great potential to make a deep run.
- Won the conference championship like 17 times
- Won the conference tournament championship like 9 times.

Would it be nice to have a couple more Final Four appearances or another national championship? Absolutely, but like him or not, his level of consistency is unbelievable. And during his time at KU, built that record with considerably less talent as it relates to recruiting rankings than UK, Duke, and North Carolina.

Coach Self’s head to head record versus the top blue blood coaches during his time at KU is impressive as well.
- Coach Self vs Coach Cal at UK: 5-4
- Coach Self vs Coach K at Duke: 3-2
- Coach Self vs Coach Williams at UNC: I believe he is 3-0

I am not seeing an under achiever here. Personally, I am not looking forward to the day he retires and we have to replace him. That will be a tough act to follow.

My point is not that Self is a bad coach. My point is to UK fans that would absolutely gripe at his numbers. UK fans are all about whoever has done well most recently.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kmohawk
You're telling me going into the 2021-22 season 3 final 4's since 2004 & 1 national championship, 7 early exits as a #1 & 2 seed would be celebrated by you & UK fans..lol.

Cal has 4 final 4's, 1 national championship, 3 Elite 8's since 2010 & UK fans are ready to fire him...but you'd celebrate Self going into 2021-2022 season. Not even Kansas fans were celebrating him. Several were calling for change.

Outside of the covid season & 2012-13 when their best player on a thin team blew his knee out with 10 games...Cal has had teams capable of making a run.

In 11 tournament appearances at UK Cal has made it to at least the Elite 8, 7 times. 7 out of 11. That's better than any current coach.

Over the same period Self advanced to at least Elite 8, 6 times out of 13 tournaments. Stop making Self out to be John Wooden like. Good grief!
This is a strawman argument, this isn't at all close to what you said earlier, this is a completely new set of statements.

The conversation was never about each coaches accomplishments, it was about first and second round losses and you literally said Bill Self had "3 to 4 times more 1st and 2nd round losses than Cal", which is incredibly false.

Also, I never "celebrated" Bill Self's accomplishments.

Why are you fabricating all this crap?
 
  • Like
Reactions: kujhawk001
And...since 2015 Self has advanced it Elite 8 - 4 times.

Cal has advanced to Elite 8 - 3 times since 2015.

2022 was the first time Self has advanced to the Elite 8 since 2018. Cal's last was 2019.
But you said Self has 3-4 times more losses in the 1st and 2nd rounds than Cal. Which is it?
 
My point is not that Self is a bad coach. My point is to UK fans that would absolutely gripe at his numbers. UK fans are all about whoever has done well most recently.
All UK fans are asking for is that UK is a threat. It seems like Kansas is a 1 seed every year, we haven't been a 1 seed since 2015.

We've also said many times, if Cal had a 2nd title, the heat would be off, well, Self has 2 titles and a very happy fanbase.
 
I've seen this thread quite a few times and for some reason i read it as 4 star frenchmen this time around. The only 4 star French product Selfs gettin is a new toupee
 
They win championships with that plan.
Won as many as UK has since Cal came here . Sooooo.. Listen Cal needs to pick it back up as last 3 years have slacked . Covid year ain't on him just like Duke and a few other young and talented rosters sucked that year for obvious reasons. So Cal needs to get his crap together for sure but everyone attacking him ofr literally everything is ****eng rediculous and just makes UK fans look like flaming morons when I know for fact the majority of us are some of the most knowledgeable fans in the game .
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT