So, here you have a program in Kansas that is currently at the top of CBB. You can argue about which of a couple of programs is “the” top program, but it doesn’t matter. As well as any program, I think Kansas can get in the door with anybody they want to recruit and, if they want, get commitments from 5-star high schoolers on a level with anybody.
So, for the last few years why have they been focusing on players not ranked as high and often talented projectable 4-star recruits (sometimes even outside the Top 100)? Is it a strategy connected to the Transfer Portal? Is it because they can no longer attract 5-star high school kids? And if it’s part of a planned approach, is it wise?
My guess is the plan assumes most Kansas 4-star freshman recruits come in understanding the need to develop and be more patient than one-year. Therefore, Kansas ends up with a carry-over base from year to year. Some of those recruits develop into very good college players, while some won’t work out as well and will transfer in their Junior year. Then Kansas identifies the top transfers and adds 2-3 of those. Meanwhile, the 4 or so incoming freshmen mostly provide depth and learn on the job.
So, for the last few years why have they been focusing on players not ranked as high and often talented projectable 4-star recruits (sometimes even outside the Top 100)? Is it a strategy connected to the Transfer Portal? Is it because they can no longer attract 5-star high school kids? And if it’s part of a planned approach, is it wise?
My guess is the plan assumes most Kansas 4-star freshman recruits come in understanding the need to develop and be more patient than one-year. Therefore, Kansas ends up with a carry-over base from year to year. Some of those recruits develop into very good college players, while some won’t work out as well and will transfer in their Junior year. Then Kansas identifies the top transfers and adds 2-3 of those. Meanwhile, the 4 or so incoming freshmen mostly provide depth and learn on the job.