![[laughing]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/laugh.r191677.gif "Laughing [laughing]")
Ok add them. UK still bests KU. Face it- UK has been your daddy and always will be.
Ok....sorry...but "go back 65 years" C'mon!!!! Love when people start bragging about things that there's NO WAY anyone here has any memory of & the game's 1,000,000 x different now than then.
I'm not even bashing UK. Just miffed that you all are just lumping KU w/ the likes of Michigan or such.
When the game between UK and Kansas meant something who won that game? Here you are again talking about regular season. It's a theme with you KU people.
Not denying that. BUT to act like KU's sooooo dominated since MOST here have likely followed the two teams (I'd say probably no earlier than mid- to late '80s) to the same degree that they have over the course of their entire histories is ludicrous.
Ok....big deal!!!! That was Cal's most stocked team EVER (possibly 2nd most to the team that lost to Wisc.) vs. Self's most OVERACHIEVING team EVER. Honestly, for it to be as close as it was, was a minor miracle
Actually, there's BOTH a Kansas City, MO AND a Kansas City, KS.
MO has Chiefs & Royals. KS has NASCAR track & MLS stadium. Suburbs-wise close to a 50-50 split to maybe even a bit more on the KS side.
![[roll]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/roll.r191677.gif "roll [roll]")
You're right. Titles aren't big deals. It's all about the regular season wins.
A
anon_9qtxg60vqzy0y
Guest
Look son, let me spell it out for you. Kansas fans claim they have the richest history in all of college basketball. They lay claim to Rupp, Smith, Naismith. That's KU's calling card. Hell they even have the original basketball rules on display at the Phog. So if you're gonna OWN and BRAG about your HISTORY, you better damn well OWN your entire body of work in your basketball history. Oh and one more thing, Kentucky beat Kansas 16 of the first 17 games we played against each other. Quit your cherry picking and for Christ's sake, take down those Helms banners. It's unbecoming of a Blue Blood.
Do I tell my son that KU's title in 08 is relevant, since he has no memory of it. Stop dodging.
Listen friend. I'm not saying KU isn't an outstanding program- it clearly is. In fact, one of the top programs. I just find it humorous KU fans come out of the woodwork when the Jayhawks are given a hard time over here. After all, it our board isn't it?
Kansas is no longer a blue blood.
Invented the game, have played more games than anyone.
They were tied in 2008 with San Francisco for championships. They've got one more than Cincinatti. They have one more than Florida.
In no sport would that be considered a "goat" program or organization.
In baseball they'd essentially be the braves.
Agree to disagree.
KU used to be a top 5 program. You've been replaced. You have no beef with UK. Your history is 2nd rate to our program. Maybe one day youll catch UConn. For now, you're at the kids table with Louisville and Florida. Stop embarrassing yourself and your program's history with cherry picked dates.
If you strictly go by titles, you are correct. I think the criteria is more expansive than that. What does trouble me about them is Self's lack of consistency in the NCAA tournament. A lot of flameouts in his time there. Having said that, Roy Williams and Self have consistently made KU national player over the regular season.
As I've said, if Kansas is a blue blood they are light, light blue.
If the Yankees, Cardinals, Lakers celtics, Crimson Tide etc. Had all that regular season success and only had 2/3 titles to show for it, they wouldn't be the names they are.
Kansas shouldn't get a pass.
You will lose this argument. Do so in grace.
They are bolstered a good bit by their huge number of overall wins and of course the conference championships.
They
So are you glomming on to Missouri or crowing about a city of like 150k?
