I am close to that same philosophy. Being just 80 miles apart, UK and UL couldn’t be more different than they are. UK is a land grant university and a charter member of the best conference in the country. UL is an urban commuter school that has been pushed into something bigger by ambitious donors and boosters. UL has used every trick and connivance to work its way from the Missouri Valley Conference to the ACC, but their AD just got booted in disgrace and their athletics department is in a whole lot of trouble. The scandal at UL is still unfolding. Both schools operate under our state university system, but it’s fair to say they are currently moving in opposite directions in terms of stability and national reputations. While acknowledging that UL remains ambitious and dangerous (in more ways than 1), I think the “cheaters never prosper” principle applies here. UK basketball dominance over UL is already at an all time high. With UL’s athletics department under the fecal microscope and Lamar Jackson gone, I think the football side of it will soon go the same direction. The scope of cheating and corruption at UL is astounding. Nobody who understands what has happened there could possibly believe cheating hasn’t extended to football. The so-called “rivalry” isn’t relevant until both schools are playing by the same rules. UK’s destiny is clearly related to the SEC, not to UL.Can't he afraid of lousiville in any sport. If you can't.beat Louisville forget about doing much in sec.