See the crack pipe gif you replied to Herro'sHero with was funny shit, this type of stuff is just cringe.Only if it's self inflicted after consuming sphincter reducing sauce...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
See the crack pipe gif you replied to Herro'sHero with was funny shit, this type of stuff is just cringe.Only if it's self inflicted after consuming sphincter reducing sauce...
2015 was cringe...and downhill ever since...See the crack pipe gif you replied to Herro'sHero with was funny shit, this type of stuff is just cringe.
Don't you think we have enough problems here in Lexington?This could go down as the worst season in Louisville Cardinal basketball history, they have been playing for about 120 yrs:
Louisville Cardinals Men's Basketball Index | College Basketball at Sports-Reference.com
Check out the Louisville Cardinals College Basketball History, Stats, Records, Polls, Leaders and More College Basketball Stats at Sports-Reference.comwww.sports-reference.com
Losses happen in sports, bud. If that's cringe to you, I probably wouldn't watch.2015 was cringe...and downhill ever since...
1511 days since we won a NCAA tourney game...that is shit that isn't funny...
Yes, to be fair, they've now won 1 in a row. Credit where credit is due.Tards are 3-19 now
Especially when you suck at your craft...bud...Losses happen in sports, bud. If that's cringe to you, I probably wouldn't watch.
Considering no team has gone undefeated since the 70's, I guess by your logic they all have sucked "at their craft" since then? 🤔Especially when you suck at your craft...bud...
Did they all have the same coach logic boy? L E A D B E L L Y ?Considering no team has gone undefeated since the 70's, I guess by your logic they all have sucked "at their craft" since then? 🤔
Pretty big difference between having 2-3 nba level talent players on your roster vs having a roster full of them which is the initial post you responded too. When has CCC only had two or even 3 NBA level players on his roster of recent time and did anything remotely special with them? Forget the championship as we know that roster was littered with NBA picks including #’s 1 & 2.That's NBA talent when you have 2 first round draft picks.
Again, what team didn't have NBA talent and won a championship relatively recently?
Why would they need the same coach? If none of them managed to not have losses or stretches without a championship, you're logically inferring they all suck at their craft.Did they all have the same coach logic boy? L E A D B E L L Y ?
Well, if you read closely...I was actually responding to the inference of Kenny Payne not winning without NBA talent, because he is like Cal, and simply pointing out every title team in the last decade plus have had NBA guys contributing heavily. So it’s not really a Kenny or Cal thing. In fact, most of Cal's successful teams, particularly pre KY, didn't have multiple NBA guys. Usually they had 1 or 2 and then some good college players. They were still often pretty good. Cal has had several UK teams not loaded with NBA talent that were pretty good. His 2nd team for instance. I just don't get the need to make up logically weak arguments.Pretty big difference between having 2-3 nba level talent players on your roster vs having a roster full of them which is the initial post you responded too. When has CCC only had two or even 3 NBA level players on his roster of recent time and did anything remotely special with them? Forget the championship as we know that roster was littered with NBA picks including #’s 1 & 2.
Your not staying consistent with your argument however. First you imply no team wins without NBA level talent referencing Kenny Payne only winning 2-3 games thus far. Many teams in the country have much better records with no nba talent on their roster and teams that have beaten Louisville this year. Then immediately jump to winning championships as your argument which moves from one end of the spectrum to another.Well, if you read closely...I was actually responding to the inference of Kenny Payne not winning without NBA talent, because he is like Cal, and simply pointing out every title team in the last decade plus have had NBA guys contributing heavily. So it’s not really a Kenny or Cal thing. In fact, most of Cal's successful teams, particularly pre KY, didn't have multiple NBA guys. Usually they had 1 or 2 and then some good college players. They were still often pretty good. Cal has had several UK teams not loaded with NBA talent that were pretty good. His 2nd team for instance. I just don't get the need to make up logically weak arguments.
Say it ain’t so!! You have to have good players to win?Cal’s only coaching ability is to load your team with NBA talent and hope they figure it out. His coaching tree has failed miserably across the board because he has nothing to pass on to his assistants that they can use at a head coaching gig.
No NBA talent, no wins for Kenny.
Sure I am. You just don't seem to understand what is being argued.Your not staying consistent with your argument however. First you imply no team wins without NBA level talent referencing Kenny Payne only winning 2-3 games thus far. Many teams in the country have much better records with no nba talent on their roster and teams that have beaten Louisville this year. Then immediately jump to winning championships as your argument which moves from one end of the spectrum to another.
Nope, just inferring with a mountain of evidence, CCC blows...Why would they need the same coach? If none of them managed to not have losses or stretches without a championship, you're logically inferring they all suck at their craft.
How many lost what to K?How many lost to K
Nope, just inferring with a mountain of evidence, CCC blows...
Who has done less with more? I'll wait...
Deflect much?How many lost what to K?
Sean Miller, Bruce Pearl, Steve Alford, Tom Izzo, Rick Barnes, Coach K the latter part of his career and others. Plenty of coaches have amassed talent and have been unsuccessful with it. Talent doesn't always translate to wins or success.
What was deflected? You asked who has done less with more. I gave you several examples.Deflect much?
Who has done less with more?
Who has had as much talent and produced the least from that top shelf talent?
You already know the answer...
Sean Miller, Bruce Pearl, Steve Alford, Tom Izzo, Rick Barnes?What was deflected? You asked who has done less with more. I gave you several examples.
All of the one's I listed have. Only 1 on that list has won more championships than Cal. Most have won less.
Doubtful. Most of them have consistently been among the best recruiters in the business. Some were even paying for players. Rick Barnes had Kevin Durant and still lost 10 games and in the 2nd rd of the tournament.Sean Miller, Bruce Pearl, Steve Alford, Tom Izzo, Rick Barnes?
LOL, you could combine all five and still probably wouldn't have the amount of 5 stars over the same period of time.
Only Ratface could even remotely approach the talent level and he won 2 titles during the exact same time.