Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe I put too much emphasis in Aike's first sentence, 3rd paragraph, original post, to wit . . . "but it got me wondering, what about those last 10 picks of the draft?" That appeared to clearly set the scope of discussion, rather specifically. Combined with the thread title he chose . . . "May want to stay in college" . . . that would clearly disqualify his most recent claim that the discussion is about the success of all players taken late in the first round. Meaning, he was never talking about players with no remaining eligibility, nor was he talking about players who were never in college to begin with.Kopi not even close. Play again.
Maybe I put too much emphasis in Aike's first sentence, 3rd paragraph, original post, to wit . . . "but it got me wondering, what about those last 10 picks of the draft?" That appeared to clearly set the scope of discussion, rather specifically. Combined with the thread title he chose . . . "May want to stay in college" . . . that would clearly disqualify his most recent claim that the discussion is about the success of all players taken late in the first round. Meaning, he was never talking about players with no remaining eligibility, nor was he talking about players who were never in college to begin with.
A very large portion of that overall failure rate he wishes to be considered is achieved by international players who had professional basketball jobs already, careers they could go right back to or, in most cases, simply not leave.
this is a very valid discussion, but I don't think an accusation of distortion (trying to move the mark) is justified when it is reasonable to use early scope statements for staying on topic, and when additional examples (such as my previous paragraph) can demonstrate how the sampled data may have not been considered to an extent to which the general conclusion of "success" is either useful or itself is not distorted.
Maybe I put too much emphasis in Aike's first sentence, 3rd paragraph, original post, to wit . . . "but it got me wondering, what about those last 10 picks of the draft?" That appeared to clearly set the scope of discussion, rather specifically. Combined with the thread title he chose . . . "May want to stay in college" . . . that would clearly disqualify his most recent claim that the discussion is about the success of all players taken late in the first round. Meaning, he was never talking about players with no remaining eligibility, nor was he talking about players who were never in college to begin with.
A very large portion of that overall failure rate he wishes to be considered is achieved by international players who had professional basketball jobs already, careers they could go right back to or, in most cases, simply not leave.
this is a very valid discussion, but I don't think an accusation of distortion (trying to move the mark) is justified when it is reasonable to use early scope statements for staying on topic, and when additional examples (such as my previous paragraph) can demonstrate how the sampled data may have not been considered to an extent to which the general conclusion of "success" is either useful or itself is not distorted.
Maybe I put too much emphasis in Aike's first sentence, 3rd paragraph, original post, to wit . . . "but it got me wondering, what about those last 10 picks of the draft?" That appeared to clearly set the scope of discussion, rather specifically. Combined with the thread title he chose . . . "May want to stay in college" . . . that would clearly disqualify his most recent claim that the discussion is about the success of all players taken late in the first round. Meaning, he was never talking about players with no remaining eligibility, nor was he talking about players who were never in college to begin with.
A very large portion of that overall failure rate he wishes to be considered is achieved by international players who had professional basketball jobs already, careers they could go right back to or, in most cases, simply not leave.
this is a very valid discussion, but I don't think an accusation of distortion (trying to move the mark) is justified when it is reasonable to use early scope statements for staying on topic, and when additional examples (such as my previous paragraph) can demonstrate how the sampled data may have not been considered to an extent to which the general conclusion of "success" is either useful or itself is not distorted.
Maybe. I've had a few beers today. Gone past two for the first time all year.It's simple. I think you're thinking too much into it.
Apparently Aike did not welcome your open challenge for mild dissenting input.
Apparently Aike did not welcome your open challenge for mild dissenting input.
You previously introduced your "other thread" as pertaining specifically to underclassmen who declared and went undrafted. None of my comments are so applicable. All of my comments are focused on the examination of draft positions 51 - 60. Who should be accusing whom of mark moving?
Yes, I consider the juniors as potential outliers. But since you wish for this discussion to have increased merit because of current UK players entering the draft, which of those are juniors? If based solely on historical data for the last 5 years, there is a 0 percent chance a UK freshman will be taken in the last 10 picks of the draft. How much does that percentage increase going back another 5 years, sir?
No one with an Afro-American Studies degree is going anywhere in life except teaching history at an inner-city middle school for 25K a year. And if you make that a UNC degree, you probably cannot read at a high school level. And all the far left fake stats to the contrary, a liberal arts degree is worthless if you don't get into and attend a professional grad school.
Staying in college, is financially stupid today. There are no real language requirements, very few if any math requirements, and nothing that you can use in life excepting maybe accounting. The chances are far greater that you will get a permanent disabling leg or back injury in those 4 years as opposed to a valid education. So if a kid gets an outside shot at playing for money here, Europe, Asia or Australia, he ought to grab it. He can always get educated AFTER his basketball career is over, if he is convinced he needs a Social Justice degree.
And don't UK players all get to come back and finish?
Resorts to baseless personal attacks to avoid accountability . . . yep, and always easy to tell who is here to fill social voids. Deep, empty ones?
No one with an Afro-American Studies degree is going anywhere in life except teaching history at an inner-city middle school for 25K a year. And if you make that a UNC degree, you probably cannot read at a high school level. And all the far left fake stats to the contrary, a liberal arts degree is worthless if you don't get into and attend a professional grad school.
Staying in college, is financially stupid today. There are no real language requirements, very few if any math requirements, and nothing that you can use in life excepting maybe accounting. The chances are far greater that you will get a permanent disabling leg or back injury in those 4 years as opposed to a valid education. So if a kid gets an outside shot at playing for money here, Europe, Asia or Australia, he ought to grab it. He can always get educated AFTER his basketball career is over, if he is convinced he needs a Social Justice degree.
And don't UK players all get to come back and finish?
Factually incorrect.
Just in my personal life, I know many plant workers and such that would give anything to have a bachelors degree. I have two friends who majored in Social Work that today are making upwards of 65,000 per year with hours and benefits that you won't find without the degree. I know it's popular to say college is worthless, but nothing could be further from the truth. Not everyone needs it, but I sleep better at night.
If you work and don't take crazy loans starting at 18, it's gravy.
Smartest people walking got their associates degree for free and work to finish within four more years. It might take longer but it doesn't matter.
And as manufacturing dries up, and "strawberry pickers" are invited from anywhere, the degrees especially in certain fields might as well be a gold bar.
And no, most players never finish that leave early. It's pretty rare. The best opportunity they have is at 19, no Work, no kids, free tutoring, coaches and parents making you go. When they get a little cash, start a family etc the chances are slim to none.
Gypsies
1/2 a milllon dollars invested wisely at age 22 - 23. Too bad we are made to believe it is corrupt to expect them to be so smart. A magnificent early retirement . . . virtually guaranteed. Skimp some off the top to pay to finish school. Get a job. What?
Am I correct that a poster on here believes that making $500k for one year should be enough to retire on? Maybe that total lack of awareness of the cost of living in the real world is why so many posters on here think that leaving early to chase that kind of money is the right thing to do. Many professionals make that kind of money on a yearly basis and live comfortably cut are not “set for life” or anything like that.
I’ve wondered the same thing.Noticed a lot lot of posters are (not) surprisingly absent from the thread. If the data doesn't scream go as soon as possible and chase cash now now, they don't want to hear it. Same posters. Their agenda is bizarre. Why hang on a college message board with this mindset?
I believe it was @Jakarii .
Yep, if you are picked that high in the second round it makes sense to go. especially since it’s very rare that a player who’s projected there ends up becoming a little pick the next year (only two have)
In the end it’s laughable for fans to act like they really care, all they really care about is if that player can help them win in college. It’s not about if the player is making a bad or good decision it’s strictly about what they can do for the fan. Players should always do what they feel is best for them, use the info they receive and then make that decision. There is no clear cut right or wrong decision because there are many examples of guys making it as second rounders or undrafted and many who didn’t make it. Same with first rounders as well.
Am I correct that a poster on here believes that making $500k for one year should be enough to retire on? Maybe that total lack of awareness of the cost of living in the real world is why so many posters on here think that leaving early to chase that kind of money is the right thing to do. Many professionals make that kind of money on a yearly basis and live comfortably cut are not “set for life” or anything like that.
What’s laughable is you acting like you know what everyone thinks.
the guy is such a joke, I'm sorry. I know you're a lot nicer than me so you don't have to agree, but he's a joke. Between me and you.
Not with a social science or history degree. Tell me what a welder or diesel mechanic makes. Even a factory worker. Now, McDonalds cashiers may do too poorly, but kids with a skill rarely loses out to a social worker.Career earnings for someone with a Bachelors degree are $2.2 mil, some college is around $1.5.
And yes, UK players can come back and finish. Like I’ve said numerous times, if someone is dying to leave, they should.
What’s it worth to finish a degree while playing for Kentucky? Compete for Titles and become a legend? What is that worth financially as well as qualitatively?
Factually incorrect.
I have two friends who majored in Social Work that today are making upwards of 65,000 per year with hours and benefits that you won't find without the degree.
If you work and don't take crazy loans starting at 18, it's gravy.
Not with a social science or history degree. Tell me what a welder or diesel mechanic makes. Even a factory worker. Now, McDonalds cashiers may do too poorly, but kids with a skill rarely loses out to a social worker.
Then you have two friends who are not truthful to you. NO social worker starts at 65K anywhere. They may get promoted to a supervisor position after twenty years in a government job, or get a masters degree or some other degree, but they are making 65 thousand if they combined two incomes. Liberal arts degrees in Gender Studies, Gay Fart Dancing, or Tranny Jock Strap design get you nowhere, except a miserable life passing out food stamp cards or working in jail administration. Of course, NPR and MSNBC will tell you differently.
No basketball player should stay in school if they can make a dime playing any pro. Risk is too high and the reward too low unless they have a true business skill.
Yep, if you are picked that high in the second round it makes sense to go. especially since it’s very rare that a player who’s projected there ends up becoming a little pick the next year (only two have)
In the end it’s laughable for fans to act like they really care, all they really care about is if that player can help them win in college. It’s not about if the player is making a bad or good decision it’s strictly about what they can do for the fan. Players should always do what they feel is best for them, use the info they receive and then make that decision. There is no clear cut right or wrong decision because there are many examples of guys making it as second rounders or undrafted and many who didn’t make it. Same with first rounders as well.
What’s laughable is you acting like you know what everyone thinks.
The napoleon complex drives me insane. When he replies to a comment and it's above the quoted post instead of below.the guy is such a joke, I'm sorry. I know you're a lot nicer than me so you don't have to agree, but he's a joke. Between me and you.
I hear ya, but I’m not trying to call anyone out. The numbers are interesting though, and a little worse than I would have expected.
As someone mentioned in another thread, it would be nice to see a breakdown of earnings overseas. But I still have to question the logic of leaving somewhere like Kentucky as an underclassmam to go play overseas, unless you are from another country to begin with.
By all accounts those overseas jobs are the toughest grind of all, often with little patience for the Americans. I know it works out great for some, but I would like to look at the data. My gut is to question whether that’s really the best path for most underclassmen to take.