Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Justin, I agree this is a good read. But I don't agree with what all you said about Fran Curci. I know his team went on probation. Yes, he did wrong. But, it's my firm belief most of the penalties where because U.K. Athletics Director at the time pushed off many basketball sanctions to the football team. Read the sanctions against the football team and you can see basketball written all over them. Cliff Hagan sold Curci out. Curci led U.K. To three winning seasons and two SEC titles. He recruited Oh., Pa. NJ. and of course his state of Florida like Stoops is today. COach Claiborne's only Bowl win was with Curci's recruits. I still find it hard to swallow that Fran Curci isn't honored in the stadium or his team or players. John
Totally agree progress is being made. But until these god-awful embarrassing and humiliating UF/UT losing streaks are ended and replaced with some degree of balance much, much work is left to be done. I like the trajectory but success is measured by wins on the field.
Well written and thought out.
You hit the nail on the head with why we should have more confidence this time around with sustainability than during Coach Brook's tenure: the obvious talent/star discrepancy on National Signing Days.
Consider the national rankings of our classes during the 5 Bowl Game streak. The five recruiting classes immediately following the five bowl games were ranked as follows: Feb. '07, #54; Feb. '08, #57; Feb. '09, #41; Feb. '10, #50; and Feb. of '11, #61.
The five classes following the Bowls averaged 52nd in the nation.
Stoops' five are as follows: Feb. '13, #29; Feb. '14, #17; Feb. '15, #35; Feb. '16, #28; and Feb. of '17, #26.
Stoops' "weakest" class was 6 spots higher nationally than the best class during the bowl streak. (The '09 class, though, had 29 signees, likely helping its' ranking into the top 40; the '15 class had only 22 signees, insuring that one two star kid would be included in our top twenty signees, keeping it out of the top 30).
The average being the 25th ranked class in Stoops' first five classes.
What will Stoops and Co. do in recruiting with a Bowl streak?
The Stoops bandwagon is nothing but presumptions and assumptions at this point. One gratuitous season doesn't get your name in lights.
Stoops is light years at this point from Claiborne, Brooks and Curci, despite the article's sugarcoating in favor of him.
The Stoops bandwagon is nothing but presumptions and assumptions at this point. One gratuitous season doesn't get your name in lights.
Stoops is light years at this point from Claiborne, Brooks and Curci, despite the article's sugarcoating in favor of him.
You must be a joy at parties.
Reservations can and should abound regarding UK football, but to disregard the praise of steady improvement and culmination with a bowl this past season as "gratuitous" is laughable. Stoops dragged the team from the mass grave that Joker threw it in.
He gets a 10/10 in my book so far unless we'd like to crucify him for bumps and bruises that come with being a first-time HC.
You are correct, I see it now in the main article about restrictive recruiting.Memeblue, I believe that Justin directly addressed that question in his lengthy article, or perhaps in posts in this thread.
Good post, but as everyone on here knows I believe that Joker had a tremendous amount of help in throwing our team into that mass grave. He inherited a team that had TWO four stars playing against seven SEC teams that AVERAGED 38 four star commits the previous four classes, and while that omits Vandy it does include the two Misses. AND he beat a top ten USC team that had 39 four star commits AND a five star, while giving NC Auburn with Cam their closest game, a 3 point loss.
Then the next two years, with the "recruiting room" the focus of our recruiting (by our opponents) he played with NO four stars contributing.
Unpleasant facts, but facts no matter how much some like to ignore them.
Stoops is doing a fantastic job, with a LOT of help totally missing before the strike
Valid points, but Joker doesn't get a pass from me with the whole recruiting thing since he basically cleaned house of all Brooks' coaches and brought in his own people who ended up not being able to coach up anyone not named Hartline or Cobb (who basically coached himself).
Talent doesn't matter if you can't develop it. Development can only take a team so far if you don't have the talent. This much is true, but Joker ran into both issues whereas Rich dealt with one.
Justin, from reading your article it appears cheating has gotten us in trouble several times. Your close to the team and college football insiders, do most people think Kentucky is clean on the recruiting trail. In other words is our recruiting success because of hard work, not something that is going to bite us in the @ss down the line.
Justin, from reading your article it appears cheating has gotten us in trouble several times. Your close to the team and college football insiders, do most people think Kentucky is clean on the recruiting trail. In other words is our recruiting success because of hard work, not something that is going to bite us in the @ss down the line.
I was at UK during the Curci era. I can attest we had some less than desirable characters on the team. Although I have zero knowledge of recruiting violations, some of the stuff players got into ...shall we say violated certain university and state laws, and they always seemed to get away with it. That 1977 team could play though....I don't have enough knowledge of the situation to refute your conviction on this point. I will say that I have talked to a lot of Kentucky football people who basically concede otherwise, but it's not my style to pretend expertise on a subject when I don't have real expertise. I wasn't even alive then so this is based on conversations with long-time UK observers and writers, lots of archived newspaper reading (a time consuming hobby) and piecemeal research.
I was at UK during the Curci era. I can attest we had some less than desirable characters on the team. Although I have zero knowledge of recruiting violations, some of the stuff players got into ...shall we say violated certain university and state laws, and they always seemed to get away with it. That 1977 team could play though....
I agree the Cats will have a Humongous '17. & BTW the Cats will be the