No surprise that Kerr is a hypocrite and has no opinion that goes against the liberal mantra.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I really do not know what his views on China might be.Liberals are the most closed minded group you’ll find. Just this week Ellen Degeneres had to defend herself because she sat with George W Bush. You’ll never see conservatives up in arms because someone is friends with someone. Liberals will. That’s not to there aren’t any close minded white supremacist nuts on the far right. Just by and large, liberals are far less open minded than a conservatives.
To your point about defending human rights on this board, I’m not a political activist. I’ll engage in some political topics on this board here and there, but I’m not a political enthusiast. Kerr is. That’s the point of contention I had. He’ll be up in arms about something moronic Trump tweets. His twitter feed is very political. He’s not shy about voicing his beliefs, nor should he be, but he doesn’t have an opinion on China’s human rights violations? Come on, that’s ridiculous.
Why would that be up for discussion?That "US Journalist" part is open for discussion.
But that's not the point. Kerr is super woke...until his paycheck is involved.Liberals as a rule do not hate America. They are generally very openminded and Their overall world view is different than yours.
I am not taking up for Kerr. I simply do not know the timeline of his interview. If you guys want to bash him, fine with me. If we are going to now take a stand on human rights on this board, I think all of you know that China is one of many countries that violate human rights. Saudi Arabia murdered a US journalist, they got a pass. This pass was given even with a taping of the incident and, in the face of horrendous human rights violations for decades. Turkey is another example but there are many, many others. I honestly just come here for basketball discussion.
I don't have a personal or political agenda when listening to this. I think it is entirely possible that he did not have a great deal of info when discussing this topic. He said he has just started reading about it.
Like most thoughtful people, he wanted more information before he made a statement that will belong to him (and) be repeated. Until knowing more about the time frame of this interview I am not sure bashing him is warranted, unless you do have a political agenda.
I see nothing wrong with being politically outspoken.Kerr is very politically outspoken. If Kerr didn't want to be known for his politics then he should have kept his mouth shut over the years.
I am sure Mohammed Ali would speak up in some manner. Kerr is no Ali. IF, Kerr had all the information at the time of his interview he should have voiced his opinion like he does on other matters.But that's not the point. Kerr is super woke...until his paycheck is involved.
Several companies are involved with china financially...but several companies dont claim to be outspoken on what's right and justice. So when a GM in your own company supports democracy and is silenced by an authoritarian regime and you wont speak up on liberty Then you arent woke, you're a coward, and nothing you say moving forward means anything.
They bent the knee to china. And said it's okay that many dont have freedom. Not everyone is expected to take a stand on everything...but when you are directly involved you probably should. And when another country is directly taking freedoms away from you at home...it may be something to speak on.
Muhammed Ali would quit boxing if he were a boxer today a china told him to shut up.
I really do not know what his views on China might be.
Why would that be up for discussion?
He was a Saudi citizen. His college degree was from the US. His children received their education from the US. He was here on an O Visa which is granted to those with extraordinary ability and achievement. He was an American journalist and your right it doesn't matter where he resides. I don't why that bothers you?Because he was a Saudi citizen. Simply writing articles with a dissident Saudi/pro Islamist slant for the Washington Post does not make him a US Journalist. No matter where he resides.
He was a Saudi citizen. His college degree was from the US. His children received their education from the US. He was here on an O Visa which is granted to those with extraordinary ability and achievement. He was an American journalist and your right it doesn't matter where he resides. I don't why that bothers you?
Come on now, who do you think will be the next commitment to UK?
I see nothing wrong with being politically outspoken.
I am sure Mohammed Ali would speak up in some manner. Kerr is no Ali. IF, Kerr had all the information at the time of his interview he should have voiced his opinion like he does on other matters.
I was a young boy when Ali refused to go to Viet Nam and I still remember it well. He did so in a very direct way. At the time, he was crucified by many. The public backlash was severe in some circles. He could have lied and said he had bone spurs but he did not. Very few of us are like Ali.
Unfortunately, this makes way too much sense for the typical Rafters poster to understand.I don't have a personal or political agenda when listening to this. I think it is entirely possible that he did not have a great deal of info when discussing this topic. He said he has just started reading about it.
Like most thoughtful people, he wanted more information before he made a statement that will belong to him (and) be repeated. Until knowing more about the time frame of this interview I am not sure bashing him is warranted, unless you do have a political agenda.
It’s not about speculating what his views on China are. It’s that he more than likely has some opinion on China with how involved he is in political discussions, but today he acted like he had never heard of China. He comes across as being a brass guy not afraid to speak his mind, but when it’d be financially risky to do so, his values went out the window. He’ll be principled when it gets him Twitter likes and retweets but won’t do it when it isn’t convenient to do so.I really do not know what his views on China might be.
IMO, the financial risk is not just a Kerr thing, but a player thing. No coach, in their right mind, is going to be the reason that a Chinese shoe company pulls an $80 million endorsement deal from Klay Thompson, or the millions that guys like Evan Turner, Lou Williams, Matthew Dellavedova and Kevon Looney get from Chinese shoe deals.It’s not about speculating what his views on China are. It’s that he more than likely has some opinion on China with how involved he is in political discussions, but today he acted like he had never heard of China. He comes across as being a brass guy not afraid to speak his mind, but when it’d be financially risky to do so, his values went out the window. He’ll be principled when it gets him Twitter likes and retweets but won’t do it when it isn’t convenient to do so.
We can argue about whether it is wise for Kerr to do what he did, but he can’t portray himself as a political spokesman anymore if he’s going to punt on this issue.
I don’t see many coaches being asked about political issues at the rate Kerr does. He often times offers up his opinions regardlessNBA coaches could take a lesson from “Football Guy” in terms of commenting on current, political issues. You think Saban, Dabo, and/or Belichek would answer that question? Hell, do you even think any journalist would think to ask them a political question?
I don’t even know what day it is. I just know when it’s game day. Oatmeal Cream Pies. My wife gets one hug from me a year; she’s a saint. We are builders of men. Recruiting season! We’re just focusing one game at a time. Durrr, derp, fart.
Not speaking out against China is easy for Libs. The steps are short from liberalism > socialism > communism.
Liberals as a rule do not hate America. They are generally very openminded and Their overall world view is different than yours.
Check Hollywood and the entire nba...players, coaches and managenentYour political beliefs aside--it is a sad day when a man will criticize our own president but bows to the Chinese government.
Liberals as a rule do not hate America. They are generally very openminded...
The issue is that its easy for the NBA and their players and coaches to be principled when they know its not going to cost them anything...in fact, the fanboy sports media here applaud them because they generally agree with their views. But, in this case, its affecting the NBA's bottom line and its not as easy pontificate on your worldview then. So, educated men like Kerr and Pop will now appear to be disingenuous whenever they comment on anything. I mean, they are towing the NBA company line, but it is still makes past and future commentary seem empty.
And, to those excusing them because they needed to know more facts....do you think they all know all the facts the other times they want to spout off about Trump or any social justice topics of the day?
Funny that it takes a no comment from an NBA coach to make republicans care about the plight of the Chinese. What a time to be alive.
Not surprised that's how you see it.Funny that it takes a no comment from an NBA coach to make republicans care about the plight of the Chinese. What a time to be alive.
Not a lie. You seem to be upset that someone truly believes and lives something that you will never get. Simply calling someone a liar because you don't agree is lazy and unimaginative.This is a lie... and a whopper at that.
Somewhere... Pinocchio's nose just grew at least 6 inches.
Youre pretty good at this "lying" concept.Not a lie. You seem to be upset that someone truly believes and lives something that you will never get. Simply calling someone a liar because you don't agree is lazy and unimaginative.