Originally posted by BobbyG_tickle_swerv:
Originally posted by TheDude73:
"In one circumstance, the NCAA received documents from a former graduate school admissions director, Cheryl Thomas, that showed a football player had been admitted and given a fourth year of eligibility despite a low GPA and no entrance exam. It forwarded the documents to a lawyer representing UNC, emails show. The lawyer then sought to interview her.
When she didn't respond, the NCAA contacted her by email for an interview. But that email shows the NCAA wanted UNC to participate."
So if she doesn't reply for an interview, will they treat this like the Derrick Rose SAT situation of not "cooperating"? Of course not...
Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/education/article18879930.html#storylink=cpy
This is precisely why I think Kane is done with this project. He doesn't mention whether or not she met with the NCAA after they contacted her, pressumably because he didn't really care enough to find out.
I'm not sure how this player's situation is remotely close to Rose's situation. In Rose's case the ETS retroactively invalidated his score after he and Memphis failed to respond to their inquiries, here you'd be asking for UNC to retroactively deny the player to a grad program.
This post was edited on 4/19 3:16 PM by BobbyG_tickle_swerv