... you brought Villanova into it... my comment is not talking about Villanova...it's comparing your past history to your recent history...we feel moving forward we are comprable programs... ask any college basketball analyst as of today who is the best program in America right now...90% will say Villanova...
Since you want to use the 64-team era as the frame of reference... here are the significant numbers, UK vs. Villanova, 1985-2018:
Titles: Tied 3-3
Final Fours: UK leads
8-4
Wins: UK leads
80-40
More regarding consistency:
*Villanova has missed the NCAA tournament
12 times in the last 34 years (85-18); UK has missed only 5, with 3 of those due to a post-season ban incurred by probation
*Longest gaps (yrs) between achievements:
Final Four: Villanova
24 (85-09), Kentucky 13 (98-11)
Elite 8: Villanova
18 (88-06), Kentucky 6* (86-92)
Wins: Villanova
8 (97-05); Kentucky 4* (88-92)
*due to post-season ban
Villanova has nowhere near the NCAA tournament success as Kentucky since '85, with UK doubling their FF and overall wins figures. There's not much validity in considering
only NCAA titles, which would suggest, for example, that Louisville and Florida have been as successful as Kansas in the 64-team era, or that UConn is the equal of North Carolina.
In terms of consistency... it's hard to comprehend, from our perspective, the futility of going nearly a quarter century without a Final Four, or nearly 2 decades without reaching a regional final.
In the 64-team era, Villanova has been nowhere near Kentucky as far as NCAA tournament success goes. As for being "comparable" going forward, good luck. We have far more resources, we're undeniably one of the sports historic bluebloods, and you're no longer in a Power 5 conference. I'll take that draw any time.