Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here's hoping he's as good as Deshaun Watson. Gunner followed by Williams sound like a lot of wins over the next 5 years.
Here is hoping his coach was serious and not blowing smoke.
He often does get lost in the QB discussions, doesn't he? Here's hoping he makes all eat their non-words about him. The more the merrier.Danny Clark is no slouch.
Yeah man, Walker Wood is the guy everybody is underrating. Most assume he will change positions but I believe the staff will give him an honest shot at the job when the time comes. He's a versatile athlete so he may be needed somewhere other than QB (where we're gonna have lots of good options) but he's got the potential to be successful there if called upon imo. He's got that SJ type of "it" factor that may allow him to overcome any physical limitations, although I do agree with most fans that Clark will be the QB of this class. I love getting guys like Wood that are athletic/smart enough to fill multiple roles, really gives the coaches some flexibility. It's just an added bonus that he's also a local kid that grew up a UK fan. I'm excited to see how the staff decides to utilize his talent.Agreed they must continue to land big names and find gems. We are loaded at QB Walker Wood is very good idc what anyone says 100% healthy he's a legit threat and very capable. I'm not a Radical Barker guy but one thing he's displayed is He used his status as a E11 QB to sway numerous prospects. Williams is trying but Barker somehow got it done and again u will not find me anywhere talking about how SJ should be benched for Barker but I must give him credit he's the best player recruiter I've witnessed at UK.
Yeah I'm trying not to be the guy that automatically dismisses Walker to another position because I do think he is a legitimate all around talent at QB. But I just think his potential as a slot guy are exciting. I see Wes Welker. So it's not that I don't think he could be a good QB, I just think he could be a better slot type.Yeah man, Walker Wood is the guy everybody is underrating. Most assume he will change positions but I believe the staff will give him an honest shot at the job when the time comes. He's a versatile athlete so he may be needed somewhere other than QB (where we're gonna have lots of good options) but he's got the potential to be successful there if called upon imo. He's got that SJ type of "it" factor that may allow him to overcome any physical limitations, although I do agree with most fans that Clark will be the QB of this class. I love getting guys like Wood that are athletic/smart enough to fill multiple roles, really gives the coaches some flexibility. It's just an added bonus that he's also a local kid that grew up a UK fan. I'm excited to see how the staff decides to utilize his talent.
No doubt, he could be great in that role. Something like a Dicky Lyons Jr (one of my all time favorites) type of WR. Renfrow from Clemson is another guy that comes to mind, undersized but just knows how to play FB, he torched Bama in the NC game. Not the biggest/fastest/strongest guy but succeeds by being tough as nails, playing fearless, running great routes, playing with a high IQ and catching everything near him.Yeah I'm trying not to be the guy that automatically dismisses Walker to another position because I do think he is a legitimate all around talent at QB. But I just think his potential as a slot guy are exciting. I see Wes Welker. So it's not that I don't think he could be a good QB, I just think he could be a better slot type.
Grumpy, the guy who looked real good was Gunnar Hoak, who threw for scores, and ran well.
Danny Clark came near the end, and looked darn fine for a kid that should have been renting a tux for prom night, but had modest numbers.
The LSU thing has always been strange to me. It's not like they struggle signing highly rated guys but it seems like they never quite live up to the hype. They always have some of the best RBs and WRs in the country but haven't been able to find a QB to match the skill guys. Russel and Flynn were very good players but that's been a while. Most of the time their 2nd and 3rd string players on D would be starters at UK. I don't think they'll trade any of them though.I agree, Grumpy. In two years, we will have some real options at QB.
And this leads me to another subject: UK, since Tim Couch, has had lots of productive QB's, more so, I would argue, than has LSU, and Auburn, and some other high profile SEC programs.
LSU is a mystery to me. Multiple seasons, the last 30 years, I have watched them and realised that all they really lacked was a real QB. Strange, that across decades and coaching staffs, the same apparent shortcoming would repeat itself, over-and-over.
Maybe Kentucky could get two defensive tackles for a QB, trading with LSU!@#$
I agree, Grumpy. In two years, we will have some real options at QB.
And this leads me to another subject: UK, since Tim Couch, has had lots of productive QB's, more so, I would argue, than has LSU, and Auburn, and some other high profile SEC programs.
LSU is a mystery to me. Multiple seasons, the last 30 years, I have watched them and realised that all they really lacked was a real QB. Strange, that across decades and coaching staffs, the same apparent shortcoming would repeat itself, over-and-over.
Maybe Kentucky could get two defensive tackles for a QB, trading with LSU!@#$
Jarren Williams looks to be a program changing QB at UK. Unfortunately, if that happens it means other QBs probably transfer. It's just the way the QB position is.
If this year goes as well as I and many of us think it well, that bodes well for 2018 and beyond. 2018 could be a special, special year imo.
I don't understand why some schools have such a hard time recruiting certain positions either, for LSU its definitely qb. Even when they won the NC under Saban, the qb wasn't very good and didn't get a whiff from the NFL, graduated and went straight into dental school. UK it seems to be DT, at UGA its WR.
I will finally be a happy UK football fan when we field a defensive unit consistent with the standard at LSU. Much respect for the tradition of pride and performance on defense at LSU.I agree, Grumpy. In two years, we will have some real options at QB.
And this leads me to another subject: UK, since Tim Couch, has had lots of productive QB's, more so, I would argue, than has LSU, and Auburn, and some other high profile SEC programs.
LSU is a mystery to me. Multiple seasons, the last 30 years, I have watched them and realised that all they really lacked was a real QB. Strange, that across decades and coaching staffs, the same apparent shortcoming would repeat itself, over-and-over.
Maybe Kentucky could get two defensive tackles for a QB, trading with LSU!@#$