ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
lol you are a gullible fool

Just because someone calls something an IVF protection bill, that doesn’t mean it’s what it does, that doesn’t mean it does other stuff, and regardless JE Vance’s opinion on IVF should not have any impact on your ability to access it as a matter of principle.

So now you're believing JD Vance's opinions? Which opinions are you believing exactly?

Do you also think that people with children deserve more than one vote, like Vance?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stan the caddy
More of this.

Public university sued over alleged use of student fees to support leftist political group​

A recent graduate of St. Cloud State University in Minnesota is suing the university, alleging that she was forced to pay a fee that went to a liberal student activist group.​

Tayah Lackie’s lawsuit contends that a mandatory fee going to a political agenda that she disagrees with violates the First Amendment because it compels speech.​



 
GDP was revised up to 3.2%. That is called WINNING!
gas was $2.60 today. unemployment lowest ever. most jobs ever created by a president. largest wage increases ever. greatest economy in history!
Biden just keeps kicking ass
GTVpeVyWYAASI6A
 
So now you're believing JD Vance's opinions? Which opinions are you believing exactly?

Do you also think that people with children deserve more than one vote, like Vance?


I’m believing the record and Vance’s support of the Republican bill to support IVF.

Regardless, I don’t think it’s an issue at all. It’s a minuscule percentage of people who want to ban IVF, in states I don’t live in. Doesn’t even rank on the top one thousand of issues I care about this election. The federal government should have no involvement. Period.

No I don’t think people with children deserve more than one vote, but I understand the perspective. No way that would ever happen, regardless.

I’m actually more hesitant with Trump/Vance economic policy (but obviously know Kamalanomics will be worse, as we’ve seen the past few years). The IVF and childless cat lady bullshit is just a side show for low information voters.
 
No you don't. You know it's batshit crazy and don't want to say it.

But I get you. We are simpatico. You can't admit that either, but I see you @Bill Cosby

There are people with lots of kids who offer no better perspective than the childless cat ladies running the democrat party. It balances out.

I have a toddler. I cannot imagine caring more about a nonexistent opposition to IVF or Vance’s criticism of willingly childless cat ladies, than I do about economic policy, taxation, spending, etc. that will actually be determined by the next administration, and that will significantly impact the world my son grows up in.

Trans stuff, IVF hysteria, etc. is just a total side show.

Edit: to clarify, I am talking federal policy. At the state and local level, I’m a little bit more open to policy banning porn in school libraries, etc.
 
You're contriving an argument. Trump made the difference between debris and the bullet an issue. I suspect he thought it seemed more manly. But regardless, he was trying to milk the incident. Most people wouldn't have made the distinction, but he did, and the head of the FBI was asked about. Obviously. nobody can tell. But that didn't stop Trump from trying to capitalize on it. Take it up with Don.
Bitch, you missed.
 
There are people with lots of kids who offer no better perspective than the childless cat ladies running the democrat party. It balances out.

I have a toddler. I cannot imagine caring more about a nonexistent opposition to IVF or Vance’s criticism of willingly childless cat ladies, than I do about economic policy, taxation, spending, etc. that will actually be determined by the next administration, and that will significantly impact the world my son grows up in.

Trans stuff, IVF hysteria, etc. is just a total side show.

Trans stuff is a sideshow. That I agree with. IVF should be protected. I don't trust the religious theocratic assholes in this state or any other to respect any reproductive rights.
 
trump knows for a fact that a would be assassin fired a rifle at him and at that instant something took off part of his ear, yet these vile leftists want “burden of proof” on trump to prove it was a bullet and not maybe just something like a raging rabid cicada.


 
Video says that they did. And were released one day later. Just like J6rs, right?

You are an idiot. The double standard is right in front of you and you do not want to see or admit it.
Nah. The truth is right before your eyes but you live in a nutty MAGA echo chamber and refuse to see anything contrary to your fake world of felon worship. Go sing in the J6 choir with the rest of the felons. All the J6 rioters were good boyz right mama??







 
Kamala said biDIM is a racist. So how’s her credibility?

I don't defend Kamala so comparisons like this don't resonate with me. I'd be good if Democrats ran Mitt Romney.

Typically when I am stuck with two candidates I strongly dislike, I don't vote for either. I am trying to keep an open mind on what is best for America, but the only way I actually cast a vote is if Beshear is VP most likely -- it's the only path I see my vote could even be relevant in Kentucky.
 
Well again you’re falling for the trick where politicians slap a label on a bill filled with poison pills then criticize people who vote against it based on the title.

There’s a small, small tiny percent of people on the country opposed to IVF. History and the record show Vance is not one of those people.

I knew absolutely nothing about Vance’s IVF stance prior to democrats making it an issue, and just a few minutes of research clarifies he supports it.
Research....that's like holy water to a vampire for Libs. They push headlines and propaganda that their media overlords push to them. They push what they hear. Actually asking them to research something would make their skin burn.
 
I don't defend Kamala so comparisons like this don't resonate with me. I'd be good if Democrats ran Mitt Romney.

Typically when I am stuck with two candidates I strongly dislike, I don't vote for either. I am trying to keep an open mind on what is best for America, but the only way I actually cast a vote is if Beshear is VP most likely -- it's the only path I see my vote could even be relevant in Kentucky.
Lmao. Yeah. You’d vote for Romney as long as he has a D next to his name. But guarantee you didn’t vote for him when he actually did run because he had an R next to it.

Lowest form of the American voter.
 
Ever heard of some dudes named Nikola Jokic, Luka Doncic, Domantas Sabonis or Reed Shepherd?? There's definitely white guys balling in the NBA.
The NBA is also completely merit/talent based. The military and government are not. Just about ANYONE can join the military or apply for a government job.
The military should reflect the citizens of the nation they are defending.
The government should reflect the citizens they are representing.
Saying there are not qualified people of all races to participate in our government and/or military is racist as hell.
But if diversity is strength why would you prefer the weakness of merit/talent? Do you always self-own?
 
Trump not committing to debating Harris now. Perhaps he's a touch scared.
Yeah, the guy who has taken on the press, debated everyone, debated Hillary/Biden with leftist moderators is somehow scared ot the powerful wit and brain power of Kamala Harris.

You all are something else.

The reality is, there's not much benefit in going to play another road game where Kamala gets the questions beforehand and you get to face one mods and the candidate. Kamala needs a debate more than Trump does.
 
More of this.

Public university sued over alleged use of student fees to support leftist political group​

A recent graduate of St. Cloud State University in Minnesota is suing the university, alleging that she was forced to pay a fee that went to a liberal student activist group.​

Tayah Lackie’s lawsuit contends that a mandatory fee going to a political agenda that she disagrees with violates the First Amendment because it compels speech.​



Then we need to sue every public university and PBS and NPR who use OUR MONEY to pay for their propaganda and causes.
 
Lmao. Yeah. You’d vote for Romney as long as he has a D next to his name. But guarantee you didn’t vote for him when he actually did run because he had an R next to it.

Lowest form of the American voter.

You're projecting
 
Typically when I am stuck with two candidates I strongly dislike, I don't vote for either. I am trying to keep an open mind on what is best for America, but the only way I actually cast a vote is if Beshear is VP most likely -- it's the only path I see my vote could even be relevant in Kentucky.

So, you're open to changing your mind about voting and for whom....cool.

This comment you made: JD Vance also said "Im a Never Trump Guy". He has no credibility. is essentially you being an ass, right, given Vance has explained this when it happened years back, and how he changed his mind.

In your eyes, only you are allowed to change your mind about a candidate?

You want A1 with your crow?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT