Please explain to me how ruling signatures don’t have to match MIBs in 5 battleground states weeks before the election can be viewed as anything other than shady?
Seriously. I’m trying to understand.
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Seriously. I’m trying to understand.
This election will be decided by the courts and anyone thinking differently is fooling themselves.
If I was Trump, this would be my perfect exit. Ride off into the sunset as a folk hero who tried his best but ultimately had the election stolen from him. Live out my remaining days with my net worth that shrunk substantially during my time in office.
The country is beyond repair. The media and political establishment are too much to overcome. If I was a rich old man, I’d stop fighting.
The country is beyond repair. The media and political establishment are too much to overcome. If I was a rich old man, I’d stop fighting.
I posted the number from October 30th. If you think hundreds of thousands of people registered in 3 days, then I don’t know what to tell you.
Upwards of 90% of Wisconsin voters have been counted as voting.
Yep I would move to Monte Carlo if I had the money
So that speech at White House at 2:30 a.m Trump says that he doesn't want to see a 4 a.m vote drop.
Then at 4 a.m there was a vote drop
This whole effing thing is rigged. We've been on here for months predicting ballot harvesting and sure as hell they did it
Then at 4 a.m there was a vote drop
This whole effing thing is rigged. We've been on here for months predicting ballot harvesting and sure as hell they did it
Redirect Notice
www.google.com
Election rules in multiple key battleground states permit voters to submit mail-in and absentee ballots without having their signatures checked to ensure the vote is valid.
Five states that have historically been competitive in presidential races — North Carolina, Iowa, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and New Hampshire — do not require signature-matching for mailed voting forms.
Ok, so you don't have specifics, you're just using this as a wedge because you don't like where the results are headed.
I don’t have the slightest clue how you could come away with that conclusion from my statement.
So assuming trump won ga and nc and Biden won Arizona and Nevada which isn't definite trump would need pa and one of Michigan and Wisconsin basically ?
Trump’s path to victory is Georgia, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Arizona.
Michigan and Wisconsin are done.
Michigan and Wisconsin are done.
A
anon_l8pbkn96tg3j6
Guest
A box of Biden ballots just flew over my house!
Like I said, this is something that Wisc will have to explain. The question will definitely be raised. The numbers seem odd but between extremely high turnout, registration lag between Oct 30 and Nov 1, and same-day registration at the polls... I don’t think the numbers are THAT crazy. We’ll find out. If it’s fraud, it’s a very poor way to do it, seeing as every Pub noticed it immediately.
No issue if they were requested ballots will reasonable oversight. That is not the same as ballot harvesting with little or no oversight.
There needs to be a stand procedure for elections that each state MUST follow. We can't have this state doing this, and that state doing something else and so on. MUST be a standard across all states that each state must follow.
What? I’ve stated my specifics, mass mail in ballots lead to fraud.
Wisconsin is at 90% turnout, Ohio 68%, Pennsylvania 73%, Arizona 66%. Do you see the difference?
State counting is a mess in exactly the states that we all knew would be key.
Nevada not releasing anymore results until Thursday?
The better question to you is are you happy with it simply because it’s giving the results you want? It’s a sham way to run a national election.
Thank you that makes sense. That is a concern. Either candidate could take this to court on a state by state basis. In court if they decide to discredit non-matching signatures they can then decide what that means and then decide which ballots to invalidate. That is all fine.
Do you think it is a bit premature to automatically question the validity of large swaths of these ballots? That to me is jumping to a conclusion that may or may not be true.
Why is this your default assumption with no evidence yet? I said before this election is absolutely unprecedented and the country is perhaps as divided as it's ever been, so why are you so stunned by the way things are shaping out?
I think someone just posted that Wisconsin allows election day registration so all people with a Wisconsin ID could show up at the poll and vote. That would explain that discrepancy IMO..
Hilarious that you think the left, who has attempted impeachment based on fabricated information from whistleblowers who at this point has never been proven to even exist, would not run a fraudulent election.
If you're too occupied with fishing, going to the park, jackin' off to porn or whatever it is people do on their day off, to go to the polls to vote, then you're a moron. your right to vote is one of your most sacred constitutional rights and obligations and shouldn't be cast aside. you can vote on your way to the park or on your way to the lake.
3-6 months is ludicrous. A whole hell of a lot can happen (as we've witnessed) in a 3-6 month span. I'm not opposed to early voting but 7 days MAX. Open the polls for in-person a week early, have Saturday and Sunday hours with it culminating on election day. If the Polls had been open back in May, how many people do you think would have regretted their vote (in either direction) come November?
Mass mailing of ballots to every registered voter without ANY sort of request from that voter or verification that voter still exists or lives where their registration says they do, is a recipe for fraud and exactly how some Dem run states planned it.
You don’t think the numbers are that crazy? They’re not even in the ballpark of other states.
138000 drop in the middle of the night, all for one candidate? That seems legit?
That's kind of why I'm optimistic. Of course, a Trump win would have been great but even if not, I'm happy with the following:
-- Minority voter turnout for GOP looks promising. (and scary if you're a dem)
-- A super close election despite cheating, a loud mouth for pres, covid.. shows there's still plenty of rational folks in the US.
-- The House made moves.
-- ACB rammed in last month.
-- Biden and Dems still need to navigate COVID, which will likely hamstring them for another year, maybe 2 (and whatever lasting affects). Good luck in 2024.
Social media and news outlets can try, but you just can't keep the masses quiet anymore. All information before mid 2010's was funneled by MSM. And that just won't be the case going forward. Minorities are waking up. And these numbers show it.
Then every state would see similar turnout. Not the case. Not even close.
So you think hundreds of thousands of people just showed up to register and vote on Election Day in Wisconsin, when early and Mail in voting has been eligible for weeks and possibly months? No
Lol. No. 90% turnout is ridiculous. 80% is too.
We need a graph showing the intersection of Biden taking the lead and drop in posters.
At the rates they happened in Michigan and Wisconsin I do. You don’t have 5 candidates on a ballot and 1 get 100% of 130,000+ votes. That’s statistically impossible.
Truth is though, no one was going to accept the results they didn’t want. My MIL was convinced Trump had this election rigged (too, she still thinks the last one was).
As stated earlier, this a year we needed transparency and as much normalcy as possible concerning the election and we did not get it. No matter who won or lost, it wasn’t going to be accepted.
Similar threads
