ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Htf do you think Mueller found out? McGahn testified. For you slow learners, he admitted it.

If Agent Orange wasn't president he would have been charged with 11 counts of obstruction. It's in the report.
Another false post brought to you by fake information. Congrats.
 
  • Like
Reactions: homeytheclown
Deflect. Your go to

Trump isn’t perfect. Many have stated 100 times over they don’t agree with his morals. Many have stated they didn’t vote for him in 2016, but like the job he’s doing.

I don’t like some of the things he’s done morally. God will judge him. But given the two options we had/will have, I’d take Trump every time regardless.

But he’s doing what’s best for the people here first. He’s trying to put America first. He didn’t go on some apology tour. He hasn’t made deals in the middle of the night going around congress to give a terrorist sponsoring country billions. He didn’t force me to buy healthcare.

Now you go. Did Obama’s fake Christian act upset you like Trump has?
 
The President can legally fire the Special Counsel, a private citizen cannot. Talking about it is not obstruction, Trump could've claimed executive privilege and Mcgahn never would've told Mueller. He didn't because there was nothing to hide.
And there it is, proof again that the real story comes out not long after a false is initiated. JamesLie, you are dismissed.
 
One of the most confounding things about this board is that if you aren't all in balls deep on every single thing Trump does, it means you're a communist Muslim marxist socialist transgender shemale who hates America.
True. Well almost. All except all in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KRJ1975
How about the fact he claims to be a big Christian?
How about the fact that you have not given proof that he is not nor have you given proof that you are so....you need to explain to me what church is, a building as you were referring? How about what Gods letter to you is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JStaff2187
Ya, I hear TRump's tweets are fake news as well. dumbass



You’re the lib taking the bait trump is laying out for you. It’s obvious what he is doing. The fed lowers rates and 2 days later trump slaps more tariffs on China.

Here’s what’s going to happen. China will retaliate it’s what trump wants. It will dampen the economy a bit then trump will strike a deal with China and next summer the economy will be on fire making it imposible for a challenger to win in 2020.

Act two will come after his re election in which trump will move more drastically to devalue the dollar. He’s made no bones about his long view on the dollar and from an economic standpoint, dealing with debt and massive deficits the devaluation has to happen.
 
You mean China renegged on a deal? Shocker.

It seems to me like Trump is handling it just like he should. Imposing some additional tariffs to force their hands. If anything, the tweets you posted come across as very positive for the president IMO. Very diplomatic.
They just posted this morning that China was buying tons of agri products. Then Trump tweets just now that China hasn't bought anything and they scream fake news. Pretty typical of this board, everything is fake news if the truth is inconvenient. They scream about how Dem's just tax tax tax. The tariffs are now equal to over 90 billion in new taxes this year, that in the largest raw dollar increase in US history.
 
I still want to know if you scream out false and fake news as your boy toy pegs your bum

Investing legend: The biggest risk facing the stock market is Donald Trump…losing.

If Trump loses, then it’ll be another game...I think the markets then will go haywire because they’ve been depending on Trump policies to keep on pushing the market up and also higher growth rate in the U.S.’

Mobius, however, told CNBC on Thursday he believes it’s unlikely Trump will be a one-term president, considering his pro-business policies have helped support a stock market that’s already seen gains of more than 30% for both the S&P 500 SPX, -0.72% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA, -0.86% since the beginning of 2017.

--------------------------------
As usual, please go jump your loon ass into the Ohio River and STFU.
 
They just posted this morning that China was buying tons of agri products. Then Trump tweets just now that China hasn't bought anything and they scream fake news. Pretty typical of this board, everything is fake news if the truth is inconvenient. They scream about how Dem's just tax tax tax. The tariffs are now equal to over 90 billion in new taxes this year, that in the largest raw dollar increase in US history.

Fake News.
 
They just posted this morning that China was buying tons of agri products. Then Trump tweets just now that China hasn't bought anything and they scream fake news. Pretty typical of this board, everything is fake news if the truth is inconvenient. They scream about how Dem's just tax tax tax. The tariffs are now equal to over 90 billion in new taxes this year, that in the largest raw dollar increase in US history.

How much are you paying on that tax? Is it drawn out of your check, cause I haven’t seen it on mine.
The price to do business in China has gone up, long overdue in my mind. Companies will either pay it, or move.
Consumers aren’t going to pay high prices for cheap made products.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AustinTXCat
Ya, I hear TRump's tweets are fake news as well. dumbass



Im not seeing the negative here. This kind of seems like pro Trump moment. Trump is making it very public how many times China has lied about a deal with us. He is making it well known to everyone that China is purposely trying to screw over the US. Because of that Trump is going to squeeze them and force them into a better deal for the US.

My guess is he is going to put up some tariffs, our economy will take a slight hit, you will come here everyday posting the stock market hits and acting like its the end of the Trump's good economy. While this is happening, China's economy will take an even bigger hit and a month or so after the tariffs, China and US will have a new trade deal that is more favorable for the US.
 

In fairness, Gillette's market share has been falling for awhile. Did the ad help? I doubt it. But to tie this entirely to the ad isn't telling the whole story. They've got more competition now than they have ever had, and their competition is much cheaper and more convenient.

Me, I use a safety razor. Blades are $1.49 for 10. No clue why people spend a dollar each or more on razor blades.
 
  • Like
Reactions: duke4life831
They just posted this morning that China was buying tons of agri products. Then Trump tweets just now that China hasn't bought anything and they scream fake news. Pretty typical of this board, everything is fake news if the truth is inconvenient. They scream about how Dem's just tax tax tax. The tariffs are now equal to over 90 billion in new taxes this year, that in the largest raw dollar increase in US history.

I think the whole "fake news" thing is childish and overblown too, but in this case it doesn't seem like a negative for the POTUS. Just my opinion.
 
Wait you mean having a commercial basically just attacking your main demographic isn't a smart idea? Who would've thought it?

This would be like Oreos having a commercial just bashing lazy and fat people who like junk food, then being surprised that the lazy and fat people got offended and decided to buy Hostes Cupcakes instead.

Also I know Dollar Shave Club has been slowly eating away at Gillettes major market share for sometime now. This add no doubt didn't help.
 
  • Like
Reactions: warrior-cat
Htf do you think McGahn was allowed to testify? Because Trump cooperated to the fullest and allowed him to. Trump could easily and legally claimed executive privilege but he did not.



That's a lie. Nowhere in the report does it say Trump would have been charged if not for the OLC. Mueller even testified to that.

Just like Mueller said the report doesn't exonerate Trump he also said it doesn't accuse Trump of a crime either.

The report made no determination at all and left the decision up to DOJ. DOJ determined the evidence was insufficient.
He testified that they never considered charging the president because they couldn't due to the OLC. His testimony was the exact opposite of what you just said it was. They didn't accuse Trump of a crime because they were not allowed to.
 
He testified that they never considered charging the president because they couldn't due to the OLC. His testimony was the exact opposite of what you just said it was. They didn't accuse Trump of a crime because they were not allowed to.


Bull f***** shit. That's one of the biggest outright lies ever posted in this thread
 
He testified that they never considered charging the president because they couldn't due to the OLC. His testimony was the exact opposite of what you just said it was. They didn't accuse Trump of a crime because they were not allowed to.

No, he said they never determined if Trump committed a crime. No where did he state that was the reason he didn't indict him, in fact he came back the second testimony clearing up that very point.
 
You know if Trump wants to make a difference in Baltimore he should just go down the hall. ....

Baltimore’s Homicide Rate Is So High, Residents Could Claim U.S. Asylum If They Weren’t Americans.

eek.gif
 
Bull f***** shit. That's one of the biggest outright lies ever posted in this thread
"I believe a reasonable person looking at these facts could conclude that all three elements of the crime of obstruction of justice have been met, and I'd like to ask you the reason, again, you did not indict Donald Trump is because of the OLC (the DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel) opinion stating that you cannot indict a sitting president, correct?" Lieu asked.

"That is correct," Mueller replied.

No, he said they never determined if Trump committed a crime. No where did he state that was the reason he didn't indict him, in fact he came back the second testimony clearing up that very point.
Same thing. They weren't allowed to make the determination.
 
He testified that they never considered charging the president because they couldn't due to the OLC
Absolutely false. Mueller came back at the start of the second hearing recanted that statement and gave a correction.

They didn't accuse Trump of a crime because they were not allowed to.

Wrong again. Mueller had the authority to make a criminal referral if he felt his evidence was sufficient. The OLC says nothing about a recommendation or referral.

Matter of fact making a determination was the job he was tasked with. Just like he had no problems making a determination on collusion/conspiracy.

Instead he took a pass and left it up to the DOJ. The DOJ examined the evidence on its own not even taking the OLC into account and concluded the evidence was insufficient.
 
Last edited:
"I believe a reasonable person looking at these facts could conclude that all three elements of the crime of obstruction of justice have been met, and I'd like to ask you the reason, again, you did not indict Donald Trump is because of the OLC (the DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel) opinion stating that you cannot indict a sitting president, correct?" Lieu asked.

"That is correct," Mueller replied.


Same thing. They weren't allowed to make the determination.

This is a troll post right? Come on now, anyone who followed the Mueller hearings know that Mueller himself came out and retracted this exact statement. I usually chuckle at the "False" or "Fake news" responses, but damn this post deserves it 100%.
 
Absolutely false. Mueller came back at the start of the second hearing recanted that statement and gave a correction.



Wrong again. Mueller had the authority to make a criminal referral if he felt his evidence was sufficient.
Wrong. He clarified that they were never allowed to make a determination that a president committed a crime, not that they determined the president did commit a crime and they couldn't indict him. Mueller absolutely did not have the authority to criminally refer a president.

This is a troll post right? Come on now, anyone who followed the Mueller hearings know that Mueller himself came out and retracted this exact statement. I usually chuckle at the "False" or "Fake news" responses, but damn this post deserves it 100%.
He didn't retract it, he clarified. See above.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT