ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
That's awesome. I'm jealous of Ron getting to watch that. I would love to watch that!
Maybe you missed the “released from the camp without charge” part. After 14 years. Regardless, thought it was worth bringing to the thread as it might become a talking point over the campaign.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: screwduke1
As usual, you DID NOT ANSWER MY QUESTION. I asked why you think bottom surgery is wrong for those under 10? Your response, as usual, is some feel-good meaningless drivel BS that one would expect from kamala.

Why is bottom surgery wrong for those under 10? YOU stated that as your position and pined "no one is fighting for bottom surgery for 10 yr olds. It literally does not happen. Not once."

So ... in your theory, why is it wrong for bottom surgery for those under 10?
What is wrong with your reading comprehension? That post is literally the answer to your question. Because children at that age haven't had the necessary time to go through the long thought process of introspection.
 
Some of it is sexualized and you know it. People post it in this thread all the time. You keep digging deeper and deeper, man.
Some of it is, just like some movies and some comedy and some music. Which is not a reason to ban all of those things. They’re dealt with on a case-by-case basis with the entertainment rating system and under the purview of parents. Drag is already included in that.
 
What is wrong with your reading comprehension? That post is literally the answer to your question. Because children at that age haven't had the necessary time to go through the long thought process of introspection.
No, you didnt answer the question. What is wrong w bottom surgery for those under 10?

So ... you are saying a requirement is a "long thought process of introspection", and this process eliminates those under 10?

How long is the thought process? Does that mean it is 10 years? If yes, then you are arguing that no one should get bottom surgery for at least 10 years once they start a "long thought process of introspection".

OR i bet you will say it is different for everyone. Which comes right back to, why cant it be different for some under 10? What would be wrong w that from your "thinking position"?

(Hint: Youre whole argument just fell completely the F apart.)

Let us cut to the quick, dion. You are all in on child mutilation at any age and you are just a fing, grooming liar.

That is what you have just proven w your "long thoughtful" response.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sawnee Cat
Unlike some of the other Leftist dim-wits on this board (Sam, Ed, platinum, jameslee), Dion probably does have an IQ well above the 98 to 105 range that the aforementioned morons have. But intelligence and wisdom are two very different things. Dion is very bright, but he's also crazy.
Dion thinks he has an intelligence above room temperature. He has proven on nearly every subject that he is closer to freezer-level IQ. Which is still double digits above the other guy(s) you mentioned.
 
Some of it is, just like some movies and some comedy and some music. Which is not a reason to ban all of those things. They’re dealt with on a case-by-case basis with the entertainment rating system and under the purview of parents. Drag is already included in that.
IT’S NOT BANNED.

Lol you’re making the point: kids can’t be exposed to adult content.
 
So how are we feeling about UK tomorrow @TheFrontRunner and everyone else? First round exit or do we finally win a NCAAT game for the first time in a few years?

Sorry to just get back to you, I didn't bet this game...really had no idea what to expect.

Nice first half overall...a couple of big tough 3s hit by Providence in the last minute for them to cut from 11 to 7.
 
Why cant the affirming care be affirming their actual sex?
Because words have no meaning for them anymore. As long as words can mean nothing, they can mean anything. Thus, permanently altering (ruining) a minor’s genitals is a good thing because it gives them what they want in that moment.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Lost In FL
Quite frankly, if bashing educators is a fascist trend, that's a point in favor of fascism. I lean towards libertarian views myself, but I will give credit where credit is due.
Of course you do. That's what they did in Nazi Germany. That's how Einstein ended up in America.
 
No, you didnt answer the question. What is wrong w bottom surgery for those under 10?

So ... you are saying a requirement is a "long thought process of introspection", and this process eliminates those under 10?

How long is the thought process? Does that mean it is 10 years? If yes, then you are arguing that no one should get bottom surgery for at least 10 years once they start a "long thought process of introspection".

OR i bet you will say it is different for everyone. Which comes right back to, why cant it be different for some under 10? What would be wrong w that from your "thinking position"?

(Hint: Youre whole argument just fell completely the F apart.)

Let us cut to the quick, dion. You are all in on child mutilation at any age and you are just a fing, grooming liar.

That is what you have just proven w your "long thoughtful" response.
Ok so I answered the question. How about you? Why do you think it's wrong?
 
Ok so I answered the question. How about you? Why do you think it's wrong?
Because it’s barbaric. We’d call it genital mutilation if it happened in the 3rd world. Adults can ruin their lives all they want, they do it every day. But these are kids.

You need to do some soul searching.
 
IN PUBLIC SPACES.
Yeah. It doesn't deserve to be banned any more than comedy, movies, or music in public spaces do. Entertainment has decency law standards already that cover adult content. Labeling all drag as adult content like stripping is nothing but discrimination straight up.
 
Ok so I answered the question. How about you? Why do you think it's wrong?
Nope. You are the one said "no one is doing it".

If it is NOT a thing, then WHY are you SO against a law prohibiting something that is, by your words, "wrong"? Your words!! Defend your position, the indefensible.

You said it was wrong for those under 10, because children have not had the time to think through it. So, your position is it should be long and thoughtful? Does that apply to adults?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sawnee Cat
The prevention of a 10 year old boy getting his genitals mutilated because he likes to cook is Nazism. Protecting a teacher from having to submit to another person’s dysphoria is Nazism.

You need help, man.
Again... You choose insane scenerios that will never happen as you sit in your Nazi Hitler bunker worried about imaginary enemies. Nutjob
 
Nope. You are the one said "no one is doing it".

If it is NOT a thing, then WHY are you SO against a law prohibiting something that is, by your words, "wrong"? Your words!! Defend your position, the indefensible.

You said it was wrong for those under 10, because children have not had the time to think through it. So, your position is it should be long and thoughtful? Does that apply to adults?
I already said. The new laws ban everything, reversible steps and hormones and such. If it only banned bottom surgery on under 14s or something we'd be having a different conversation. But they ban all gender-affirming care.
 
I already said. The new laws ban everything, reversible steps and hormones and such. If it only banned bottom surgery on under 14s or something we'd be having a different conversation. But they ban all gender-affirming care.
1. Are you saying you support laws banning bottom surgery for under 14?

2. Why are you against banning child genital mutilation? Especially if "no one is doing it"?

3. Why under 14? Because they need to think about it? How long does someone need to think about it?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT