ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
...... Posts about how trans people know who they are better than any of us ever will.....
As many have posted before.....they are mentally ill. Too bad modern day society overturned thousands of years of mental health facts.

 
FWD9EKIVEAALVFl
Willy still wood
 
Because when those weapons are discharged in elementary schools, movie theaters, shopping malls, restaurants, grocery stores, and city streets....it can kill me or someone I personally know.
When a trans person whacks off their weiner and puts on a dress it doesn't change a thing in my life. ***I don't think trans males should be able to compete against other females due to physical advantages though.***
When a gay person marries another gay person it doesn't change a thing in my life.
When a woman is raped and decides to abort that baby it doesn't change a thing in my life.
Your rights end where mine begin.
When I own a gun it doesn’t affect you in the least because I’m not going to discharge it in a place that will kill any children, you or anyone you personally know unless you or someone you know tries to break into my home and threaten my safety. Since you aren’t going to do that why should MY rights to own firearms be infringed upon?
 
GD! That thing is right. Just the other day, I discovered I was pregnant. I had accidentally read some misinformation from Faux News that because I had a penis that I couldn’t get pregnant. I’m here to tell you that’s untrue.

It was a tough decision but my fetus said to me, “Non-binary C-3PO LeBron James (thats my Christian name), I understand that I might get in the way of your career of being a part-time barista and whore, so you can kill this clump of cells. I won’t mind.”

With tears in my eyes, we both said a spiritual chant to RBG and decided to part ways.
 
I think the people freaking out about red flag laws need to chill. Something had to be done. If you’re concerned that they’ll start taking guns from sane people, don’t worry about it. We have a super conservative Supreme Court. If it’s unconstitutional, due to a lack of due process, it will get modified, at the very least.
Not if they murder a couple of justices. I’d say that’s very likely. They have been marinating in a godless stew for 25 years and the product is vile.
 
The state paying a raped mother to birth the child with an additional bonus to raise the rapist’s child. The Handmaid’s Tale wasn’t a fictional piece in the the conservative world. That’s an evil and twisted line of thought.
Yes it’s a real dystopia that defenseless humans can’t be murdered on demand. Grim, indeed.
 
I think the people freaking out about red flag laws need to chill. Something had to be done. If you’re concerned that they’ll start taking guns from sane people, don’t worry about it. We have a super conservative Supreme Court. If it’s unconstitutional, due to a lack of due process, it will get modified, at the very least.
Oh, okay. 😂 Yeah, don’t be paranoid everybody. This group just wants to kill you and has weaponized every intel agency to target political opposition. I mean, it’s not like simply rejecting alphabet cult indoctrination and not wanting your kid masked all day gets you labeled as a domestic terrorist by the DOJ and feds. It’s not like our government is already inefficient with mistakenly putting people on the “no fly list.” We see what gets labeled “hate speech” and “‘misinformation” and what gets to stay up.

Just seven years ago, you all claimed gay marriage wasn’t a slippery slope: in no time, we have had trans bathrooms, alphabet mafia curriculum in schools (something that was mandatory in California), men dominating women’s sports, a growing number of kids confused about gender cause it’s now “cool”, leftist educators trying to hide stuff from parents, article after article to be apologists for pedophilia, and more.

Everyone knows how the left operates. They just need an inch to kick the door open for a bigger agenda.

“Just two weeks to flatten the curve.”

“Get the shot or you’re fired and you can’t travel!”
 
If the courts were being intellectually honest and actually following the Constitution then this decision would not have come down as it did. The 14th Amendment clearly defines that as person who is born in the United States is a citizen. It also declares a right to privacy for US Citizens. The constitution does not mention a fetus anywhere. It also does not provide any rights or protections to a fetus. These are only extended to citizens.

If they were actually sticking to the strict interpretation of the law, then what a woman does in private is of no concern to the federal government and that right to privacy is protected. So, if she were to seek assistance from a physician for any medical matter that is an established private right.

Since the constitution does not identify a fetus, and only provides rights to those who were born in the United States, then there is no possible way that the constitution could provide protections for it or even recognize it. States could certainly pass laws, but just like with abortion, a fetus is not mentioned in the constitution and there is no reason that the supreme court would uphold a state law that limits a citizen's constitutional right to privacy because of something that is not explicitly stated in the constitution.

In his decision Alito specifically wrote:

“The contending sides in this case make impassioned and conflicting arguments about the effects of the abortion right on the lives of women. ... The contending sides also make conflicting arguments about the status of the fetus. This Court has neither the authority nor the expertise to adjudicate those disputes.”

If that were truly the case then he would deferred back to the defined rights established by the 14th amendment, an abortion and a fetus are not mentioned in the constitution, said this was an issue of privacy and moved on. They didn't. At this point they became activists on a side of ethics and morality which they argued was the problem with the original decision.

It has zero to do with women. Nothing at all. It's about undoing a completely judicially created right that was nothing more than judicial activism. Congress can still pass a law making it legal. They could've all along. They just won't. Know why? Because despite the npc news telling you different, there is very low support for it.

Now feel free to return to vox and/or screaming into the air.
 
Not what I understand. Weapon could be taken in your scenario if the cop responding agrees or at least suspects. Probably a low bar to err on the side of immediate safety.

Then the person making the accusation needs provide evidence that what they say is true to a judge & the judge believe it. And if the judge believes it, s/he'd have to have you evaluated & then treated as necessary. W/o all that, you get weapon back. I'd have a time limit on that - like two weeks for the judge to decide. Also, if the judge doesn't agree, accuser could be subject to lawsuits and/or arrest for false accusation. But again, what do I know.

But none of that is just randomly taking a weapon.
Well people have had ex's call on them out of spite and they people never got their guns back. Imagine an Amer Heard type that is willing to go to the cops and lie to ruin your life...
 
Taken from Reddit, You can always count on this cult to want to violently lash out any time they don’t get what they want which is why the Jan 6th stuff is such a total sham considering what is routine for the left.

F8vKnkkzb6ZI.jpeg


I also would find it a bit interesting some 160 pound blue-haired Antifa skank to navigate these rural areas and think they would scare guys who usually have no shortage of guns.
Reddit, im told, is a moderate website were both sides can be expressed and they only ban extremist post on both sides... I wonder what a leftist would have to post to be considered extremist?
 
We are back to the 1800s with this Supreme Court decision.
Hyper emphasis on state's rights is what eventually led to the Civil War and Jim Crow laws.
The federal government and Supreme Court's role is to be an arbitor of issues like civil rights and abortion. It's role is to look at protecting individuals from simple majority rule of all issues.
Majority rule allowed slavery and Jim Crow laws.
This Supreme Court is the most radical in US history and Republicans will pay a heavy price at the polls for it for years to come.

The republicans were gonna annihilate the dems in the mid terms. Not sure now as the uneducated masses will focus on this over inflation and the crap economic.

I also don't get the obsession with this Jan 6 for the dems. Trump is the one Republican they might have a shot beating with weekends at Bernie's as their potential candidate again. Remove him and any Republican will literally send uncle joe out to pasture.

On your goofy and hyperbole civil war narrative as a moderate I'm putting my money on The conservatives. Liverals are pussies with no guns.
 
How was she shot and killed when you said the police didn't have any weapons?
I'm not sure why the CP officer inside had one other than to protect important targets like Congress. DC law prohibits anyone from having firearms within 1000 feet of a 1st amendment protest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sambowieshin
The rape thing is the law in Ky. I have daughters and granddaughters. This law is sick as fu**.
I wouldn't be nearly as pissed if there were reasonable exceptions to these laws.
It will be interesting to see if someone aborts the fetus of a 12-yrs old if that person could be convicted 12-0 by a jury even in KY.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sambowieshin
We are back to the 1800s with this Supreme Court decision.
Hyper emphasis on state's rights is what eventually led to the Civil War and Jim Crow laws.
The federal government and Supreme Court's role is to be an arbitor of issues like civil rights and abortion. It's role is to look at protecting individuals from simple majority rule of all issues.
Majority rule allowed slavery and Jim Crow laws.
This Supreme Court is the most radical in US history and Republicans will pay a heavy price at the polls for it for years to come.
Here’s the good thing about this ruling Sam. If there are aspects of your states laws that don’t allow it, you can always go to another state to have the abortion. But more importantly. This puts this issue where it should be. It is much easier to get a law changed at the state level than the federal level. I don’t think victims of rape or incest should be forced to have the child either. I think the morning after pill is a very reasonable thing to have available. However, I also don’t think abortion should be a convenient form of birth control for irresponsible, callous people which is a large % of abortions. Thankfully if enough of us at the state level press for the changes we want we can get things done much easier now.
 
Last edited:
Abortion from rape makes up 0.5% of abortions. Sad it happens, but it is a rare thing. Liberals probably think rape happens for 99.9% of abortions.
So your point is that 0.5% should have to carry to term? Me, I don't see the difference as to what % it is.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Duke Blu
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT