I apologize for not mentioning a fab non-binary people.
I apologize for not mentioning a fab non-binary people.
Why on earth does PP take in federal funds? It’s nothing more than laundering taxpayer dollars to the DNC through donation.BOOM! Thank you! Great post
"Most American women favor making the birth control pill accessible over the counter. According to a 2017 Kaiser Family Foundation survey, three-quarters of women of reproductive age support over-the-counter access to birth control pills.
So why hasn’t it happened? It must be that awful, religious-right-dominated GOP that’s standing in the way, right?
Actually, not so much.
Republicans, in fact, have repeatedly tried to make birth control pills available without a prescription, only to face opposition from . . . Democrats and Planned Parenthood.
"Yes, you heard that right. Democrats — and Planned Parenthood — have fought against making it easier for women to get birth control pills. Why? Well, they have their reasons."
"In Planned Parenthood’s case, it’s probably, according to Hadley Heath Manning writing in Forbes, because they’d make less money. “Planned Parenthood’s stance on expanding access to birth control may be illogical in light of their mission statement, but it is perfectly logical when you consider the group’s financial interests.” Planned Parenthood brings in 1.7 billion dollars in revenue annually according to it's latest financial report and contraception accounts for 27% of the services they provide. "
How about contacting your State Representatives instead, as they are now the ones in charge of making the decisions as it should be.If you don't like the SC ruling, contact your representatives in Washington who can change that. The Dems control both houses, right? So what's the problem?
Yeah! Then go jump your loon as Into Guist Creek Lake^ November 15, 2019.
* KA - BOOM *
![]()
Consumer sentiment falls to record low in June as inflation persists
Consumer sentiment logged a record low in June as Americans continued to face elevated prices for gas, food and other goods and services.finance.yahoo.com
Thanks, Joe! Now get the hell outta here.
Two tons of fun, doncha know…..kerwin quit posting...i heard he found a lady at a roe protest...RIP kerwin
![]()
My understanding is she wanted Hillary to select her successor. We know how that turned out…. ThankfullyShe's the one that screwed the pooch for Dims by not resigning while Obama was still in office. Dang shame, isn't it?
Two tons of fun, doncha know….
You're trying to "what about" and shift the topic because you are too much of a coward to admit the truth.
Facts: the procedure to remove a miscarried baby is now illegal in every state where abortion is banned. Women who suffer miscarriages naturally (not from drug abuse) will be forced to carry a dead baby to full term, which could kill the mother. And you sick PoS are OK with it. You don't care how many innocent women die for your insanity.
Sorry for what happened and sorry you had to share personal info to refute that clown.This is bs...my ex had two miscarriages and didn't happen.
She was large and in charge……..kerwin thought it was a fun...until he died when she tried a fatal facesitting maneuver
Because there isn't near the support for it msm and social media would have us believe. That's why it was never codified in the first place.
Guarantee this will be the case. Insurrection is okay when it's done by the Democrats.![]()
Dems Pause January 6 Hearings To Call For Insurrection
WASHINGTON, D.C.—Democrats have temporarily pushed pause on the January 6th hearings in order to lead an insurrection against the federal government. The post appeared first on The Babylon Bee.parler.com
You mean the mentality that began when some judges peered at the 14th amendment, squinted very hard, and saw that it was talking about abortion? That moment in 1973 when the left began to realize they could legislate from the bench?This has not been a true Supreme Court in decades, because of this very mentality
EXCELLENT point. Now the reality that many so called blue states may not be on board with butchering babies is setting in.Because there isn't near the support for it msm and social media would have us believe. That's why it was never codified in the first place.
EXCELLENT point. Now the reality that many so called blue states may not be on board with butchering babies is setting in.
I voted against Trump for the policies and un Presidential behavior.Until they are allowed to be cross examined and not fed leading questions, I’ll take any of that testimony with a grain of salt. The questions are framed to get the response they desire out of those testifying with zero opportunity for rebuttal or cross examination.
You all are ate the phuch up with this Jan 6 charade of a hearing. It’s literally all you all have. You’re more worried about the feels Trump gave you than what his actual policies and agendas did for the American people.
Because when those weapons are discharged in elementary schools, movie theaters, shopping malls, restaurants, grocery stores, and city streets....it can kill me or someone I personally know.How does our decisions to own as many weapons as we desire affect you?
Well if it's SUCH a deeply ingrained and inalienable right, why would any congressman vote against it? Everybody wants the right to abortion in America, right? SC went against what everyone wanted, right?I hear Collins & Murkowski are cooking one up. Still the fil=buster issue though.
What do you mean.Supreme Court nipping that purple state bs in the bud.
There is a simple solution to all this leftist KILLING of unborn HUMANS...GET OFF your lazy ass and either don't have sex if you know you aren't protected until you get FREE contraception from planned parenthood. It's 2022 people. If you aren't responsible enough to prevent the sex from getting you pregnant then you either aren't mature or responsible enough to have sex. It's that simple!Do we have a Constitutional right to have a Dr cut off a perfectly health arm? Of course not, what if it became popular and political? What if it was being done by people in back alleys? Still wouldn't.
Abortion is no different than Euthanization, it isn't a Constitutional right. If a State wants to ban it or make it legal it isn't in the Federal Govt's role to make it legal or ban it in all 50 States. It's up to the citizens of that State to decide. Thats all the Supreme Court did today, put it back to the citizens of each State to decide, and took away power from the centralized Govt.
People tagging the FBI.
Doesn't violate Twitter standards. However quite accurate info that might cause vaccine hesitancy and you are banned forever
The Bork fiasco ended all of that. Everything ever since that moment has turned the highest court into political puppet.You mean the mentality that began when some judges peered at the 14th amendment, squinted very hard, and saw that it was talking about abortion? That moment in 1973 when the left began to realize they could legislate from the bench?
You could not be more accurate but maybe not in the way you meant. Overturning this abomination may go a long way in restoring competence in government.
The Bork fiasco ended all of that. Everything ever since that moment has turned the highest court into political puppet.
The subsequent four decades have filtered that mentality down to the lower federal judge appointees, where the entire branch has been a tool utilized by red and blue. With way more frequency and political purpose than ever before.
So no, I don’t think this is a step in restoring competence in government. Rather it’s a continuation of the abomination that it has become.
Oh no the havoc and chaos will be for a good cause. Nothing to see here. No arrests will be needed.Are they going to suspend the Jan 6 hearings to address this most recent fomenting of insurrection putting our Democracy in grave danger?
Nobody should have any f'ing rights over someone else's body.Noone that's actually pro life should struggle at all with this ruling. It was 100% judicially created right and now the judiciary rightfully returned to legislators the responsibility for conferring or denying said right.