ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
His stop and frisk worked but at the end of the day it was unconstitutional.
That said...you and I are probably in agreement on most crime related issues.
I am against defunfunding police.
I am for stricter jail terms.
I am for building more prisons.
I think the Three Strikes laws were good.
I think the legal justice system is too soft on crime.
I think we should hire more cops and pay them better.
I'd like to see firing squads and chain gangs make a comeback.
I feel the same about our military.
I get bashed on here for being liberal but I'm ONLY liberal about decisions that ONLY effect the individual making them.
If your decision doesn't impact me IDGAF....ie abortion, trans issues, gay marriage etc.
Those decisions are all between that individual, their doctor and God IMO.
How does our decisions to own as many weapons as we desire affect you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lost In FL
I am also concerned for women impregnated via rape or incest. These trigger laws are more extreme than the Taliban. They at least allow exceptions for rape. It's nuts.
xe3vha139k791.png
 
Ok enough of me enjoying liberal years, for now, so here's some real talk for the lib visitors:

Your ire should 100% be focused on your congresspersons. Rbg told you all for years that roe was on shaky ground. She was right. It was 100% judicially created, so it could be judicially dissolved; like it was today.

All those years, it could've been codified at the federal level. Still can. States had no issue passing something one way or the other.

So you can listen to the charlatans who are encouraging the outrage, or you can blame them as the ones who truly failed you.
She's the one that screwed the pooch for Dims by not resigning while Obama was still in office. Dang shame, isn't it?
 
Watch this then get back to me about best President in our lifetime. Fox News is hiding all of this from view. Judge for yourself. It's ALL Republicans testifying.

Until they are allowed to be cross examined and not fed leading questions, I’ll take any of that testimony with a grain of salt. The questions are framed to get the response they desire out of those testifying with zero opportunity for rebuttal or cross examination.

You all are ate the phuch up with this Jan 6 charade of a hearing. It’s literally all you all have. You’re more worried about the feels Trump gave you than what his actual policies and agendas did for the American people.
 
Of course states can pass all the restrictions they want, but Biden can still allow them on military installations within that state & perhaps any Fed property there.
 
I don't care what side of the fence people are on with the Roe vs Wade thing. I am Pro-Life and am struggling with this ruling. Of course it now goes to the States which is fine, but is this really necessary? We have much bigger issues going on in this country right now
 
  • Like
Reactions: sambowieshin
I don't care what side of the fence people are on with the Roe vs Wade thing. I am Pro-Life and am struggling with this ruling. Of course it now goes to the States which is fine, but is this really necessary? We have much bigger issues going on in this country right now
Doing the right thing is always necessary.

We’ve watched our entire culture start to disappear due to that mindset. There will always be other issues to give attention to.
 
...so they are fighting for the right to not be inconvenienced when they go to kill their fetuses.

I guess that's another right among the "penumbra of rights" found (or more accurately pulled from the @sses of liberal justices) in the constitution.
They view their pregnancy as an inconvenience. They surely can’t be expected to be inconvenienced aborting it. That’s the mindset of these people.
 
I don't care what side of the fence people are on with the Roe vs Wade thing. I am Pro-Life and am struggling with this ruling. Of course it now goes to the States which is fine, but is this really necessary? We have much bigger issues going on in this country right now
This is my opinion. More fuel thrown on to the fire by the Supreme Court, unnecessarily. An embarrassing escalation of conflict, which adds to even more division and for what?

I read through all of this as political gamesmanship: better overturn Roe v Wade while we can. This has not been a true Supreme Court in decades, because of this very mentality
 
I don't care what side of the fence people are on with the Roe vs Wade thing. I am Pro-Life and am struggling with this ruling. Of course it now goes to the States which is fine, but is this really necessary? We have much bigger issues going on in this country right now

Noone that's actually pro life should struggle at all with this ruling. It was 100% judicially created right and now the judiciary rightfully returned to legislators the responsibility for conferring or denying said right.
 
I don't care what side of the fence people are on with the Roe vs Wade thing. I am Pro-Life and am struggling with this ruling. Of course it now goes to the States which is fine, but is this really necessary? We have much bigger issues going on in this country right now
From a constitutional perspective, the decision was absolutely right, abortion rights weren't found in the constitution, they were invented. It was a stilted and awkward decision with little precedent and even less constitutional basis to support it.

From a practical standpoint, I understand where you are coming from, but this Dem-led congress can simply pass a law to preserve the rights given by Roe v. Wade. If they are this incensed about the ruling, they should do something about it...as they should have 50 years ago, when congress' inaction created the vacuum filled by Roe v. Wade.

I also agree that we definitely do have bigger issues to tackle in America right now, but abortion will still be available, it just might not be as convenient for everyone, so the extreme reaction to this decision from the left is absurd.
 
From a constitutional perspective, the decision was absolutely right, abortion rights weren't found in the constitution, they were invented. It was a stilted and From a practical standpoint, I understand where you are coming from, but this Dem-led congress can simply pass a law to preserve the rights given by Roe v. Wade. If they are this incensed about the ruling, they should do something about it...as they should have 50 years ago, when congress' inaction created the vacuum filled by Roe v. Wade.

I also agree that we definitely do have bigger issues to tackle in America right now, but abortion will still be available, it just might not be as convenient for everyone, so the extreme reaction to this decision from the left is absurd.
Congress can't reverse this. Manchin will never allow the filibuster to be nuked over this. I doubt Sinema would either, even though she would almost certainly support the law to preserve Roe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: exemjr
From a constitutional perspective, the decision was absolutely right, abortion rights weren't found in the constitution, they were invented. It was a stilted and awkward decision with little precedent and even less constitutional basis to support it.

From a practical standpoint, I understand where you are coming from, but this Dem-led congress can simply pass a law to preserve the rights given by Roe v. Wade. If they are this incensed about the ruling, they should do something about it...as they should have 50 years ago, when congress' inaction created the vacuum filled by Roe v. Wade.

I also agree that we definitely do have bigger issues to tackle in America right now, but abortion will still be available, it just might not be as convenient for everyone, so the extreme reaction to this decision from the left is absurd.
I agree with the majority of this, however I completely disagree “if they are so incensed they should’ve done something about it years ago”. The lefties could say the exact same thing about the right for the previous 4 decades, and this premise does not validate any ruling, by any stretch of the imagination. The original or the latest case.
 
Been such a fun day trolling their cult,

Schumer does love threatening and denigrating the SCOTUS, don’t he? What ever happened to the executive, judicial, and legislative branches respecting each other as co-equals and refraining from anything but respectful and principled criticism.

But hey, nothing happened to Chuck for his “ whirlwind “ comment, which was an obvious threat and incitement to violence against SC justices, so why should he be restrained now?

He should’ve been prosecuted or at a minimum censured for that .
 
Do we have a Constitutional right to have a Dr cut off a perfectly health arm? Of course not, what if it became popular and political? What if it was being done by people in back alleys? Still wouldn't.

Abortion is no different than Euthanization, it isn't a Constitutional right. If a State wants to ban it or make it legal it isn't in the Federal Govt's role to make it legal or ban it in all 50 States. It's up to the citizens of that State to decide. Thats all the Supreme Court did today, put it back to the citizens of each State to decide, and took away power from the centralized Govt.
 
Incredibly intelligent response.

I can't even imagine what type of brain damage you must have suffered earlier in life to be standing here today believing that a woman who suffers a miscarriage should be forced to carry a dead baby inside her even if it kills her. But here you are.
This is bs...my ex had two miscarriages and didn't happen.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT