ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
If there are enough abortions, maybe illegal immigration will go down
Abortion is murder. Re financial issues in this thread. America is under judgment because of abortion among other things. Roe V Wade needs overturned. 62 million and counting

Be not deceived. God is not mocked. Whatsoever a man sows that shall he also reap.
 
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jemima...o-aide-details-sexual-harassment-allegations/
maxresdefault.jpg

You know this lady is telling the truth. Because democrats have told us that women don’t lie about this.
Oh buddy you’ve got both yours tits in the ringer now.
 
Last edited:
27 is considerably more than I would have guessed (5-10). No idea how many were violent with police. What about women? How do those compare with other races?
13 is the correct number. That one is from the WaPo data base, which pretty much everyone considers to be accurate. Just fyi, according to the WaPo database, the number of unarmed blacks killed by police has never exceeded 20 in a calendar year for the history of the db. So much for all the claims of police genocide on blacks, OR, if police really are conspiring to kill blacks in a genocide, they sure aren't very good at it.

The "27" number is from a different database, which even the small print concedes is run by data scientists and "activists." It includes rubbish that even WaPo doesn't consider death by cop. For example, unarmed black robber flees on foot and is pursued by cop on foot. Robber runs out into traffic and is fatally run over by a white bus. Robber dies from said fatal injuries, such fatal injuries robbing him of his dreams and leaving behind 12 children all under the age of 6. Witnesses report that the fleeing robber had his hands up while running and was shouting "Don't Chase me! I'm just trying to feed my children." Is it fair to say that the black cop killed the black robber? I don't think so, but some biased databases do. The only thing clear about that to me is that the bus is racist.
 
Last edited:
Understand. But every time abortion is mentioned it needs to be repeated that it’s murder.
Is abortion murder if the mother is a socialist, or is it just voter suppression?

I'm pretty sure that if you asked the socialist mother, she would say it was voter suppression forced upon her by an oppressive, capitalistic society that didn't want any of her kids voting.
 
Last edited:
Social media is not free speech you damn lunatics. You are still free to walk out of your trailer and scream you conspiracy bullshit to your neighbors because that is free speech. Social media is a business and they get to decide who their customers are. That's called capitalism. Pretty much the only time I see any tweets is in this board so I give no ****s about it.

153456928_2996104677274094_911788639043762997_n.jpg
 
I oppose blanket student loan forgiveness. But I do believe that the federal government should allow people to re-negotiate their interest rates on student loans. A lot of student loans are locked in well above 6%. I believe that the federal government could compromise with borrowers by doing a one-time re-finance for everybody.

After the re-finance, then they should create a tier of loans based on majors of demand and material importance to encourage directional decision-making for students. Fields of demand and high importance (STEM for example) will receive very low interest rates to encourage people to target those majors. Majors that are oversaturated or otherwise do not have a high demand in the economy should not be covered by the government, and therefore need to seek private lending or logically decide against it. Continued educational lending by the government should no longer be predatory and enriching of universities that are producing useless educational products.
 
(0) Why would Grassy compile a list for you? That's a lot of work.
(1) Are you familiar with the difference setween dismissing a case procedurally and hearing the merits of the case? For example. the SCt just dismissed the PA case on procedural gounds; it did not take the case on its merits. Thus, no one can argue that the PA case stands for the proposition that there was no fraud in PA.
(2) Now that you know the difference between procedural dismissals and decisions on the merits, here is one list for you. Please let us know if there are any factual inaccuracies in the article.

Do you know the difference between winning a court case and losing it? You can't cite any wins that would validate any claims of election fraud because there were none that would change the election outcome. There was zero evidence presented that would stand the scrutiny of a judge/jury......NONE. It was nothing more than unprovable lies.
There are, however, more videos released by the military of UFOs than there are examples of court cases won by the Gulliani/Trump Lying Clown Show.....That should be a huge red flag regarding election fraud claims.
 
Libs will use this as an excuse for Joe never stepping a foot in there and answering questions for the next 4 years.


There will be a positive test every week for the next 203 weeks. They can't afford to put dizzy dean or the jizzy queen in front of the camera's to answer questions off of the cuff.
 
Do you know the difference between winning a court case and losing it? You can't cite any wins that would validate any claims of election fraud because there were none that would change the election outcome. There was zero evidence presented that would stand the scrutiny of a judge/jury......NONE. It was nothing more than unprovable lies.
There are, however, more videos released by the military of UFOs than there are examples of court cases won by the Gulliani/Trump Lying Clown Show.....That should be a huge red flag regarding election fraud claims.
Originally you said that Trump's team won 0 cases and you challenged Grassy to provide you with a list. You sound like a petulant chump. I provided you with an article that listed several Trump victories.

Now you're off into gibberish land saying that fraud only exists if it "would change the election outcome." That's ridiculous. The election was rife with fraud. You now have your list of cases. Compile a complete list of reasons, case by case, explaning in detail why you don't think they involve election irregularities. Single space it with 1.25" margins.

To quote Hillary, "Biden is illegitimate and stole the election." End of story. He and Heels Up Haris are frauds.
 
Abortion is murder. Re financial issues in this thread. America is under judgment because of abortion among other things. Roe V Wade needs overturned. 62 million and counting

Be not deceived. God is not mocked. Whatsoever a man sows that shall he also reap.
I personally know a mother recently that went into premature labor due to serious genetic issues with the unborn child. She had such high blood pressure and complications that a decision was made to abort the child unfortunately. The baby had no chance of living on its own and the 26 year old mother most likely would have died without the procedure. Are you saying that doctor, with the mother's consent, murdered that child? Are you saying that type of abortion should be illegal? If so, you would have sentenced that mother to death for a child that had zero chance of survival. Absolutist abortion ideology is nuts.
 
Originally you said that Trump's team won 0 cases and you challenged Grassy to provide you with a list. You sound like a petulant chump. I provided you with an article that listed several Trump victories.

Now you're off into gibberish land saying that fraud only exists if it "would change the election outcome." That's ridiculous. The election was rife with fraud. You now have your list of cases. Compile a complete list of reasons, case by case, explaning in detail why you don't think they involve election irregularities. Single space it with 1.25" margins.

To quote Hillary, "Biden is illegitimate and stole the election." End of story. He and Heels Up Haris are frauds.
Again, you gave ZERO cases that Trump won that reversed anything. He either won the cases and overturned election results or he didn't. Citing a few rinky dink procedural BS examples changed nothing.
He either won and overturned the results or he didn't. It's not hard to understand.
 
Do you know the difference between winning a court case and losing it? You can't cite any wins that would validate any claims of election fraud because there were none that would change the election outcome. There was zero evidence presented that would stand the scrutiny of a judge/jury......NONE. It was nothing more than unprovable lies.
There are, however, more videos released by the military of UFOs than there are examples of court cases won by the Gulliani/Trump Lying Clown Show.....That should be a huge red flag regarding election fraud claims.
Do you understand what he posted? Nope.
 
Originally you said that Trump's team won 0 cases and you challenged Grassy to provide you with a list. You sound like a petulant chump. I provided you with an article that listed several Trump victories.

Now you're off into gibberish land saying that fraud only exists if it "would change the election outcome." That's ridiculous. The election was rife with fraud. You now have your list of cases. Compile a complete list of reasons, case by case, explaning in detail why you don't think they involve election irregularities. Single space it with 1.25" margins.

To quote Hillary, "Biden is illegitimate and stole the election." End of story. He and Heels Up Haris are frauds.
#NOTMYPRESIDENT
 
Again, you gave ZERO cases that Trump won that reversed anything. He either won the cases and overturned election results or he didn't.
It's not hard to understand.
"He either won the cases and overturned election results or he didn't."
First you told Grassy that Trump won no cases. Then when I showed you he did, you changed the topic. Nobody said that Trump overturned the election. Do you understand what it means to win a court case? You either win or lose. Like the article said, Trump won 2/3 of cases that were heard on the merits. I tried to explain to you what winning on the merits means. I can't explain it any better. You're just having a petulant tantrum.

But sure, if you want to say that Trump won no cases because the election was not overturned, you keep shouting that.
 
Last edited:
I oppose blanket student loan forgiveness. But I do believe that the federal government should allow people to re-negotiate their interest rates on student loans. A lot of student loans are locked in well above 6%. I believe that the federal government could compromise with borrowers by doing a one-time re-finance for everybody.

After the re-finance, then they should create a tier of loans based on majors of demand and material importance to encourage directional decision-making for students. Fields of demand and high importance (STEM for example) will receive very low interest rates to encourage people to target those majors. Majors that are oversaturated or otherwise do not have a high demand in the economy should not be covered by the government, and therefore need to seek private lending or logically decide against it. Continued educational lending by the government should no longer be predatory and enriching of universities that are producing useless educational products.
I cosigned a Sallie Mae student loan for my son and set it to where I pay the interest (plus a little more) each month, the goal is to make sure when he takes it over after graduation, he's paying mostly only principle. problem is I have to get a different loan for each school year. they aren't huge loans, he'll owe less than 30K when he graduates, but I do think that upon graduation they should be able to consolidate and refinance those into one lower interest loan. (mainly to get my name off of it, LOL)
 
Saw this posted on my Nextdoor app. Going to be a long summer.

Protesters back. I heard last night that protesters were back on Bardstown Road blocking traffic and driving the wrong way in the lanes. Also heard more protest in future, and on March 13 the anniversary date of Brianna Taylor there is going to be An Extravaganza Event. Just be aware of your surroundings, more than usual
 
I cosigned a Sallie Mae student loan for my son and set it to where I pay the interest (plus a little more) each month, the goal is to make sure when he takes it over after graduation, he's paying mostly only principle. problem is I have to get a different loan for each school year. they aren't huge loans, he'll owe less than 30K when he graduates, but I do think that upon graduation they should be able to consolidate and refinance those into one lower interest loan. (mainly to get my name off of it, LOL)

I could be wrong, but I don't believe the federal government re-finances loans themselves. You have to go through third-parties to do so. This has screwed some people over during the pandemic because people who consolidated through third parties were expected to continue making their payments, whereas people who still had their loans owned by the federal government were reduced to a temporary 0% interest rate and suspension of payments. Not to mention, if the federal government does any sort of blanket loan forgiveness, then it will not apply to the people who have consolidated to lower interest rates through third-party lenders.
 
  • Like
Reactions: awf
That was an abortion procedure I cited. An unborn child was aborted to save the mothers life. Every abortion is not for means of birth control.
You still haven't answered the question. Should that mother have carried that baby to full term even if it meant her loss of life at age 26?
The answer was in my answer. You were using that incident to justify killing babies. Doctors save lives according to procedures and law concerning medical practices and life saving conditions. But your case is rare and used by you as a deflection. Abortion is murder when not determined as a medical emergency determined by doctors. Over 99% of abortions are murders and not a medical emergency decision. Just like the liberal cuck you are you use a situation not relevant in the actual reason for the discussion.
 
That was an abortion procedure I cited. An unborn child was aborted to save the mothers life. Every abortion is not for means of birth control.
You still haven't answered the question. Should that mother have carried that baby to full term even if it meant her loss of life at age 26?


I highly doubt anyone has an issue with this, but the problem with all leftists in this type of argument is that you want to use this extremely uncommon occurrence to excuse the great preponderance of abortions that are simply for convenience. Like Ben Shapiro said why dont you just say she was homeless with cancer as well to that way you can get all the sympathy
 
Disturbing truths . . .


San Juan del sur was home to me until I went further south. You can’t go wrong moving to Latin America if you stay away from certain countries
 
  • Like
Reactions: awf
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT