Although it isn’t important but I thought the ref clearly ejected him when he kept yapping after they broke everyone up. The ref clearly ejected someone. Peters went straight to the locker room. Anyone know what happened?
Peters Ejected?
- Thread starter UKfanINcoach
- Start date
Could have swore the ref even said he'd been ejected
The refs decided that he should have to witness the butt whipping that he caused. However, they didn't want him to play which is the reason they made that bogus blocking foul on him to foul him out.
The official said #21 was ejected and checks back into the game later? I can’t imagine how that happened. Does anyone have an explanation?
It did look like it, and the announcers said he was tagged with a F1 and a technical and the tech on a State player and the UK player off set, but I though the Cats only shot 2 FT's did I miss some FT's for the Tech?????
Uk should have had 4 FT and the ball based on what I saw but college rules suck now and they don’t want to upset the snowflakes that are playing, so they make 5 levels of rules. What a joke.
I was hoping someone would clarify as I was watching in a area where I couldn’t hear the TV. I plainly saw the ref point to the locker room and watched Peters walk off. Then miraculously he returned. WTF?
That is what I thought, plus I thought only football had off setting penalties. We used to shoot the all the technical foul shot, you never know who will make theirs or miss them.
Thought I heard that also and Peters headed to te lockers without waiting. ???????
Of course this is the only logical explanation. But, was it ever mentioned by the commentator's? Otherwise, we all saw the ref signal he was out, he then headed to the locker room and they showed this, so at what point was anything else shared? I guess I missed it.
Does anybody think it's odd to see grown men harassing a 18 19 year old kid after being sent to the locker room got me thinking that's all
Give the kid crap a rest!! When you knowingly and unnecessarily commit an act that could possibly injure someone, you are not deserving of some type of good will. That wasn't his only bad act of the game. He committed a foul in the first half that should have given him a technical foul. I stated at halftime if the game gets out of control, it would be the refs' fault. You could clearly see things were only going to get worse because the refs were permitting it.
Also, the law of this country says he is a man and not a kid. If he is truly a kid, sending those of his age off to war to get shot at and possibly killed are far worse than getting harassed. I digress, but just a thought as to why the kid crap doesn't fly with me.
Last edited:
They aren't kids. They are adult athletes getting paid.
Apparently they reversed the call
But they almost immediately fouled him out when he checked back in
