have you talked or interacted with Musk before? I have.
+ @IdaCat l could share some of the interatctions, probably better over a beer that I'm happy to treat you and IdaCat to. One thing I will say is, a lot of these interactions with rich/influential people have given me examples for how I should and how I shouldn't carry myself.Very curious about this.
As of 2024, the rate of banned accounts has tripled since Elon Musk took the reigns:
Account suspensions on X have tripled since Elon Musk took over
Social media site releases its first transparency report in over a yearfortune.com
As of 2024, the rate of banned accounts has tripled since Elon Musk took the reigns:
Account suspensions on X have tripled since Elon Musk took over
Social media site releases its first transparency report in over a yearfortune.com
If this force was so coercive, how did Elon Musk opt out of this force? How is Mark Zuckerberg allowed to say that at all?
It's indicated the US Government forced censorship of social media. That's incorrect. The companies willfully obliged & wanted that involvement...because they are tech titans and government can be their friend.
Seems to me he just simply stopped censoring as much and allowed multiple viewpoints, which unfortunately seems almost the exception and not the norm anymore.
I believe there was proof of government vetting and censorship of information, especially pertaining to public health, which imo is very problematic. So I’m happy that seems to have been ended.
I mean, I studied journalism in college. At one point I wanted to go into print journalism but opted into a tech route in my life (bullet dodged). Humans having bias is pretty much Journalism 101. I really agree with the founders as it pertains to free speech. The key is diversity of sources. Twitter is a source that encapsulates many, but there are thousands upon thousands of sources and humans can opt out of any of them.
Immediately going back to the country's founding, we had politicians of high notoriety releasing newsletters under pseudonyms. Not that much has changed if you think about it.
Journalist used to be the sons and daughters of blue collar workers. Now journalist are the kids of Harvard grads who also went to Harvard and went into journalism because they either couldn't get into Hollywood or they want to "change the world"...What exactly does a journalist actually do in an environment where citizens film all the news as it happens (and then give it to the news sites), and people can self report news in X, FB, etc? Oh also, AI can do writing for the few that can't write well.
Just a heads up on why I was so active in Alex Jones thread..My undergraduate degree was genetic engineering with an emphasis on molecular and cellular biology. If I needed to research something or find a study I would go on pubmed and have multiple articles and studies at my disposal that I knew were non biased. Certain publications (like Nature for example) had a higher score or rating meaning it was more difficult to get published in so you knew studies in those publications were typically of higher quality. This made it generally easy to find good information on certain subject with minimal effort. The fact that you, a journalism major, feel that basic news to the public should consist of one biased source vs another biased source that the general public should then be able to filter on their own after lots of time and effort saddens me. It’s also unrealistic to expect that, and just leads to an uninformed populace. This allows corruption and other negatives in society. I just fundamentally disagree with you. I think there should be a source like pubmed for basic news where you can go and have easy and quick access to non twisted and biased news.
BlueSkys apparently has a ton of pedos on it. They aren't even trying to kick them off either. Musk, one of the first things he did when he took over X was to start kicking the pedos off.You want the pedos to have a platform on X?
Just a heads up on why I was so active in Alex Jones thread..
I get that most people think "it's not that bad" but it really is that bad. Jones is so easy to pick on and it gave them the justification to set a standard. Debanking was the next step and it's already started. America is supposed to be a nation of laws and rights and one side has decided those things are conditional on your politics.
just leads to an uninformed populace. This allows corruption and other negatives in society
The money is atrocious in journalism and if you’re conservative, it’s going to be very hard to get into any of the major publications which are reserved for the left’s preferred demos. The local papers are poverty level. To even make decent money, you have to get to the major networks/papers which as you’re pointing out, is filled with someone helping get them that job (and that’s not even mentioning the cost of living in those markets).Journalist used to be the sons and daughters of blue collar workers. Now journalist are the kids of Harvard grads who also went to Harvard and went into journalism because they either couldn't get into Hollywood or they want to "change the world"...