Langford
- Thread starter TNCatfanforever
- Start date
My guess is he's shady. Cal either gets the ok or not ok from the compliance department.
My guess is they said no can do.
My guess is they said no can do.
3 Reasons::::::::Quickly. .Johnson..Herro..
3 More::::::Green........SGA......Baker..
Haha, not every recruit that Cal passes on is shady. Can’t get them all.
seems like Romeo Langford didnt pass the audtion at the Fiba tourney.. and now looks like vandy is leading. kinda tells you all you need to know.
Another subtle shot at Cal by the same poster that takes a negative slant on absolutely EVERYTHING UK.
When will the mods show this guy the door?????
When will the mods show this guy the door?????
I post a tread for intelligent discussion and you immediately hijack it...If you don't know enough to discuss stay out of my discussions...this board is no place for 7th graders.
Lets see you joined in May and he joined in April....you qualify for veteran status here....not...now go out for recess.
7th graders start garbage posts saying UK will not win another game the rest of the season after we lost to Auburn 2 years ago which is what YOU posted. That’s what 7th graders do.
was wondering about that comment too lol. Like saying I didn’t eat dessert today because I ate too much at thanksgiving 2 years ago.
Cal and Langford split ways during the USA games .... lets just say cal didn't like the idea of Langford downplaying his back pain and costing team USA a roster spot for a healthy player
Thanks...I was looking for an intelligent response. I knew at one time we were in his final list of 7-8.
Ahhh you are a veteran at posting negativity but you’re a good poster because you have lots of posts? What a joke.
I am a good poster because I am not always a sunshine pumper...I call it like I see it both good and bad. I am not afraid to call out coaches or players or to compliment coaches or players. This is a discussion board. It is ok to be critical of Cal. He is certainly not perfect. He is incredible at what he does but has made mistakes. Stoops has done some good things but good grief please don't tell me you enjoyed that performance on Saturday. Just discuss and stop attacking me in every post.
You better listen to this board's very own dividend aristocrat...... you cant possibly live up to his wealth and intelligence
Because he's in a position we will be fine at currently
SGA, Green, and Baker...two of three will return
Quickley, Herro, and Johnson coming in
I think we are fine at wing/guard
SGA, Green, and Baker...two of three will return
Quickley, Herro, and Johnson coming in
I think we are fine at wing/guard
Oh absolutely. Criticisms and critiques of Cal and UK are more than OK... for actuall UK fans...
Not so much for pretend UK fans
#recess
8.4% (lol) of your posts have been liked. Which basically means you’re quite awful at posting.
Compared to Cardstink with more likes than posts ...
If we’re gonna talk about “posters being tired” of someone...
Do you even arithmetic bro?
It's simple really, we are absolutely loaded at the Gaurd position and have no need for Langford. Cal went after other recruits and landed them. It's not that hard to understand.
I could do without him. He is too easily ruffled in some cases especially humor-wise but no effect either way..
I could care less if my post are liked. I am not here to be liked but to be factual. Some of the snowflake posters on here do not want to here things like Cal has under achieved at UK. I am huge Calipari fan just as I was Joe B. Hall but for the amount of talent they have had they both greatly underachieved. There is no reason we do not have at least 2 more titles. We lost to an inferior WVA team in 2010 and two Uconn teams that should never had beaten us if we had played a zone for 10 min. We were beaten by a Wisconsin team that was good but not in the league with us talent wise. All we had to do was have Ullis and Booker on the floor instead of the twins and throw the ball to Towns. I am not ready to concede the recruiting wars to Duke like many on here have. I think if we can bring some of these men back along with the three committed adding Williamson and possibly Wiseman then we should be preseason number one and poised to win number 9. If we lose several of these guys and don't add Williamson and Wiseman then next year could be lean. The jury is still out on this team but all the national experts are not high on this team. They see what we all see but some are afraid to admit it. We are slow on defense and offensively challenged.
I am perfectly happy with our three incoming guards. I think Herro is going to be a star and he is flying a bit under the radar. Lets just keep Green, Alexander, Gabriel, SKJ,, and PJ Washington and add Williamson and Brown or Wiseman.. For once I want all the pieces of the puzzle and not have a missing piece here and there.
Did you used to post on the old AOL board back in the day?
I thought your OP is a fair and reasonable question and I️ don’t agree with the attack on it.
I also agree that some title chances may have slipped away as they have for K and everyone else. Hindsight as to how a team could have one is not only moot to the actual game it is speculation. We don’t know that a zone would have made a difference or Tyler and Booker being in would have helped.
My biggest complaint is many people that trash the team when we don’t play well then disappear and don’t even consider giving Cal or the team praise.
Many of us here might be a bit too positive or optimistic but several on here seem to thrive on bringing this team down.
Last edited:
Most people should follow our lead imo
You'd really laugh if I told you why I wanted Langford at UK...
Similar threads
