Hope this works, I'm new to adding links. http://thespun.com/acc/louisville/michael-decourcy-louisville-sex-prostitution-scandal
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Go back to the criminal cards board. Better hope your baseball team does something this yr. it's all over.Hope this works, I'm new to adding links. http://thespun.com/acc/louisville/michael-decourcy-louisville-sex-prostitution-scandal
Money will have the least impact.
Vacated games and banners.
Scholarship reductions down to like 6.
Post season bans.
Television ban.
I disagree a bit. I think the NCAA has learned over the years to be a bit clinical in their approach, and that is much safer. Were they disgusted by UL? Yep, did they want to punish them severely, I'm certain they did, but how they did it was appropriate and beyond reasonable complaint. Instead of the punishment looking like a vendetta, it became a natural result of actions. It's all about player eligibility. Once they ruled those 3 guys ineligible, the rest was the natural fall of the dominoes. UL, in effect, is punishing themselves. They should have known about these parties and self reported, but they did neither. They played everyone. Oh well is the response from the NCAA, they were ineligible so give us a list of games they played in during this date range. Those games must be vacated and any NCAA monies obtained for any of those games refunded. There is no vendetta, no anger from the NCAA, just a clinical hammering on UL by UL. Reap what you sow. I think this will be the pattern of the NCAA going forward. No more of Emmert acting like a King and meting out punishment on his whim. Nope, here are the rules, this is the rule you broke, this is the punishment for breaking that rule. Pretty simple and the way it should have always been. UNCheat will see a similar, expanded fate, at their own hands.I like Mike but he's just wrong here.
You aren't going to create a deterrent by making programs re-pay money, or keeping them from being competitive for a few years. If that's all you want to throw around forget it, there's no real risk in cheating.
Taking away the accomplishments IS the ultimate penalty. That's why they went light elsewhere, losing a title is a devastating nightmare. Louisville has no guarantee they'll ever see another,
The NCAA wanted to hit them where it hurts the most, and we have proof that the banner is just that.
Take a poll of
Pitino
those players
Jurich
Staff
Louisville fans.
They will give you whatever you want to keep the banner. That means the NCAA hit them where it MATTERS. Period.
I've always believed the ncaa takes the "where there's smoke, there's fire" view. Thus I've always believed they nailed UK so hard because of all rumors that swirled around the program during the Rupp, Hall and Sutton years.UK got a tv ban over one player allegedly getting shipped $1000 and one player who was deemed to have cheated on the SAT. One year TV ban two seasons banned from post season play. Kind of agree with mike in this article, Louisville was hit hard but should have benn hit harder. UNC should be darn near dealt the death penalty (it was heavily discussed for UK in 89).
The fact that so many Louisville fans, coaches, former players, etc are screaming that they should fine them and leave the banner should be all the proof you need that the banner matters the most.
Tom Jurich doesn't give an F about the money because it wouldn't be his money. He'd just take more from the citizens of Louisville and put the leftovers in his son's pocket.
Embarrass them. Take their seasons. Crush them going forward. They've done two of the three so far. Looks like they'll skate on any additional postseason bans.
Should have been worse, but I'll take it.
Did he really right, "we had no attraction for Miss Powell and her shenanigans, especially paying "?
What a dumbass. He admits they got it for free
It's not about the money. Money can be replaced. It's about all those wins and the 2012 and 2013 banners. For the NCAA to punish UofL in a just and fair manner, the wins and the banners have to be vacated. Anything less and it's just a slap on the wrist.
Agree totally, but you have to think the financial penalties are greatly magnified by it happening commensurate with the newly made public financial abuse by the so-called leadership of the university.It's not about the money. Money can be replaced. It's about all those wins and the 2012 and 2013 banners. For the NCAA to punish UofL in a just and fair manner, the wins and the banners have to be vacated. Anything less and it's just a slap on the wrist.
No sympathy from me for current players at Uvel or UNC, anyone dumb enough to go there with that big storm cloud hanging over them can just suck it upIMO, I like the "natural consequence" approach taken by the ncaa in this case. It's never made sense, penalizing current players for violations that occurred years earlier. You play with ineligible players, you don't get credit for the wins. On the other hand, if it happened to UK, I'd still wear my National Championship shirt around; would still talk about the nc; would tell my kids about it; and where teams have crap like "white-outs", I'd start a movement to have a national championship celebration night (among fans).
For me, not being a big bball fan, it's ALL about the banner.
Preach it sisterMcGee paid the girls. Probably out of his own pocket to maintain deniability. Does Russ really think we don't know that?
Men are stupid. They screw around and never think the women are going to keep evidence that will incriminate them.
No sympathy from me for current players at Uvel or UNC, anyone dumb enough to go there with that big storm cloud hanging over them can just suck it up