You said they have what we had last year. They do not.
They aren't nearly as talented as we were. They don't return several key contributors from a Final Four team. In fact, last we saw them they were struggling to perform against WSU's guards.
They should be a good team. They usually are. But picking them as a title team isn't in the same ballpark as picking us was last year.
Btw, Duke was extremely talented last year with 3 first rounders.
UConn 2 years ago? Decent team that got hot at the right time. But nobody was picking them to win the title preseason.
Could Kansas win it? Of course. They just don't look like a very smart pick to me.
I said the notion of having a core group of experienced, really good players and bring in a couple elite guys and that's similar to what we had...a year UK lost 10 games and the next year go on an historic run.
Are they as good as last year UK's team? No. But again, that's the same reason people are high on UNC and Maryland. I have no idea how well they will do our is it all hype, but I do know it's a similar setup as UK had. Again, to be clear, i'm not comparing teams and players, just the concept