not sure why this wasn't a tech. he threw his shoe....
its at 1:21
its at 1:21
Did anyone else see the jackson st player trying to stop Garrison with his shoe?
- Thread starter howitis
- Start date
Wow! It’s not like he was tossing it aside either. He chucked it! Shocked that wasn’t a T.
Loved Garrison's reaction immediately after the basket. WTF was that?!?!
Thought i
Saw that as the play happened - he lost his shoe at the other end of the court but play never stopped - saw him retrieve it ...but run WITH it
Which was a first - then yeah - he hurled it in the direction of our guy there
Garrison was briefly caught on film afterwards and you could read his lips "WTF was that about" or similar
Pretty funny
Should have been a technical
Ref"s probably too surprised to know what to do
Also - sounds like a Billy Clyde G coaching tidbit
"Perry - after you BLOCK this free throw...."
Saw that as the play happened - he lost his shoe at the other end of the court but play never stopped - saw him retrieve it ...but run WITH it
Which was a first - then yeah - he hurled it in the direction of our guy there
Garrison was briefly caught on film afterwards and you could read his lips "WTF was that about" or similar
Pretty funny
Should have been a technical
Ref"s probably too surprised to know what to do
Also - sounds like a Billy Clyde G coaching tidbit
"Perry - after you BLOCK this free throw...."
If he clips Garrison on the foot or somewhere with that wizzed shoe and he comes down on it wrong after the dunk and breaks his ankle and we don't win the natty because of it….
It wouldn't have been so “funny” then as another poster put it.
Thats the 1st time we have ever played Thug St and I bet its the last.
They have no business being on the same court with UK !
It wouldn't have been so “funny” then as another poster put it.
Thats the 1st time we have ever played Thug St and I bet its the last.
They have no business being on the same court with UK !
Will be interesting to see if anything else comes of this - it was a weird scene
Exaggerate much ? Losing Garrison cost a "natty", "Thug State". What exactly makes them a Thug school ?
Yeah we noticed that last night.
I think that’s an absolutely Punk A$$ move by that kid who threw it.
At least no one was hurt but obviously it was thrown intentionally to cause harm.
What if Garrison came down on it and twisted an ankle or something.
Actually that should have been a Flagrant foul and that kid ejected from the game.
I think that’s an absolutely Punk A$$ move by that kid who threw it.
At least no one was hurt but obviously it was thrown intentionally to cause harm.
What if Garrison came down on it and twisted an ankle or something.
Actually that should have been a Flagrant foul and that kid ejected from the game.
Exactly why it should've been an ejection imo. He threw that low and our player could've easily landed on it. Very dangerous play.
Of course pathetic officials did nothing.
Either way throwing equipment should result in a T. It could’ve hit a player, an official, etc. just bizarre.
Because the Good Ole Zebra boys be hatin.
We don't get calls in Rupp!
You think if Garrison threw his shoe at one of them JSU players he wouldnt get Ted up thrown out and susoended? The SEC may have also sought lethal injection!
Oh they mad at what Ky has brewing and they should be!
If he wanted it off the court he could have thrown it in any other direction, NOT directly into the direction of play. For example, he could have thrown it toward his bench. He carried it with him down the court and threw it toward players rather than away from them. It was intentional and dangerous.
So you’re saying he threw it in the direction of Garrison and his aim sucks. The fact he threw the shoe in that half of the court should be a T, doesn’t matter why.
Agree. If he was throwing it aside he should have underhand tossed it towards the scorers table. Not Mahomes side arm at the baseline where the ball and players were.
It doesn't make any sense that he would fling his shoe as hard as he could far in front of him in the direction of our player if he was "just getting it on the sidelines." I'm convinced it was absolutely directed towards Garrison and he just missed.
Zero chance that is what happaned. The play was essentially over because he couldn't catch him. No reason to not just put it on. He tried to knock the ball out of garrisons hands
Yep, and he could have put it back on just as quickly as picking it up and running the length of the floor and then throwing it(obviously not to just get it off the floor)
