It's pretty certain at this point that Indiana, Oregon, and West Virginia are all 3 seeds. That leaves one spot for us to possibly take.
Do we want that three or would we rather have a 4 with a better shot at getting to play in Louisville?
For arguments sake, let's say we do end up as the 4th 3 seed with the aforementioned teams. West Virginia would go East to Philly (Philly is about 90 miles closer to Morgantown than Louisville). Oregon would naturally stay West and go to Anaheim.
That would leave UK and IU fighting for Louisville with the 'loser' getting Chicago. Maybe the committee would say Chicago is more of Indiana's 'natural' region and put them there, but if they were going by distance and considered IU a stronger 3 than us then they'd get Louisville.
Of course all that would depend on who the 2 seeds are as well. For example if Michigan State were the 2 seed in Louisville they wouldn't make IU the 3 seed there. Or if Oklahoma was the 2 seed in Philly they wouldn't make West Virginia the 3 seed there.
Do we want that three or would we rather have a 4 with a better shot at getting to play in Louisville?
For arguments sake, let's say we do end up as the 4th 3 seed with the aforementioned teams. West Virginia would go East to Philly (Philly is about 90 miles closer to Morgantown than Louisville). Oregon would naturally stay West and go to Anaheim.
That would leave UK and IU fighting for Louisville with the 'loser' getting Chicago. Maybe the committee would say Chicago is more of Indiana's 'natural' region and put them there, but if they were going by distance and considered IU a stronger 3 than us then they'd get Louisville.
Of course all that would depend on who the 2 seeds are as well. For example if Michigan State were the 2 seed in Louisville they wouldn't make IU the 3 seed there. Or if Oklahoma was the 2 seed in Philly they wouldn't make West Virginia the 3 seed there.