I knew there would be some over-reactions to what I predicted before the trip as 4 relatively easy wins. Yes, we looked awesome but these teams might have had some NBA talent, but Toronto we didn't play as well but were able to easily win because they couldn't hit the broadside of a barn. We also were able to turn-over the guards on the 3 other games and play uptempo which fit at this time into where the team is capable. The Serbian team except for the physical center were not grown men, most were 19 to 21 years old and one NBA prospect got hurt although we had already built a sizeable lead anyway. However, it was great to see that this team didn't shrink from physical play and you couldn't say the same for last year's team.
Eaves may be correct in certain ways, but ignoring some other issues. First, PJ was awesome and showed those skills which really only manifested at the end of the season. So PJ this year is already better than PJ of last year. Same obviously for Richards. Reid was a bit disapponting on offense but he was great on the boards another weakness from last season. Our guards have a whole season to gain experience and Quade was decent last season and certainly now has experience. The big difference this season is all the depth. I hope Cal does all season what he did in these games which was play everyone with substantial minutes. Every single game the other team by 10 minutes to go were worn down, and this was a huge advantage as we weren't. Duke may match our starting 5, maybe the Zags and a few others might have a more cohesive and equally talented starting 5, but no one has all this talented depth. Two players who will see action didn't even play except Mongomery in the first game. Name one team that has all this talent?