Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
WR but forgot the name.Is that the UK coaches have reached out to with the Odom termination?
There's an Ole Miss DL commit who had scheduled a UK visit even before Luke was fired. Be interesting to see where that goes too.These next few weeks until Dec. 18th could be interesting.
I hate to say this, but I hope the players who plan to enter the portal at UK do so soon. That said, if we have some openings between first signing period and second, I could see Big Dog and the staff going hard for some high profile additions.
Fully expect UK to lose several transfers, just not enough PT.Based on interest from recruits, sounds like they'll enter one way or another. In post game radio interview, stoops said they only concern with recruiting this year is numbers. Said it is a bad year to be low on scholarships. He went on to say some kids will be entering the portal.
So sounds like the number will be based on the interest from recruits/transfers which is apparently very high
WR but forgot the name.
UPDATE: Name is JJ Hester.
Fully expect UK to lose several transfers, just not enough PT.
But that's how recruiting works..."We need you Mr Superstar WR because we want to upgrade our offense!"Your offense is like ours, have to ask why any WR would want to play in either.
But that's how recruiting works..."We need you Mr Superstar WR because we want to upgrade our offense!"
We can at least pitch we ran out of quarterbacks and if we can’t throw you the ball we might let you run wild at qb.Your offense is like ours, have to ask why any WR would want to play in either.
Sounds like there may be some kids pushed out the door.Based on interest from recruits, sounds like they'll enter one way or another. In post game radio interview, stoops said they only concern with recruiting this year is numbers. Said it is a bad year to be low on scholarships. He went on to say some kids will be entering the portal.
So sounds like the number will be based on the interest from recruits/transfers which is apparently very high
Your offense is like ours, have to ask why any WR would want to play in either.
We seemed to be chucking it quite a bit with Terry and then Sawyer in FLA game. We will never throw it 50 times a game but Gran wants balance.That is selling ice to Eskimoes.
But that's how recruiting works..."We need you Mr Superstar WR because we want to upgrade our offense!"
I think when Beaux Allen gets here and if he throws an accurate college ball, that will change.
JMO
That is selling ice to Eskimoes.
That is selling ice to Eskimoes.
Eventually worked for Alabama though... prior to the last 3 or so years their WRs have largely been pedestrian, but now they might have 4 that will be taken in the 1st or 2nd round of the draft over the next few years.
My guess is that Saban is wishing he would have run the ball more and slung it around to the pencil necks a lot less and beaten Auburn.Bama can thank Lane Kiffin for their offense. Saban hated it and it eventually cost Kiffin another job, but he opened Saban's eyes. Now he has more talented arms throwing to great athletes playing WR. They may have 3 of them taken in the first round this spring.
My guess is that Saban is wishing he would have run the ball more and slung it around to the pencil necks a lot less and beaten Auburn.
I agree... the big TO's early in LSU game (Tua fumbled on scramble in opening drive), last year's Clemson game (pick 6 on opening drive) and plethora of them in Auburn game even with Tua are a big reason why Bama loses those games whereas in year's past they were not as prone to these TOs.My guess is that Saban is wishing he would have run the ball more and slung it around to the pencil necks a lot less and beaten Auburn.
Not really. I would take risks on Bama's receivers any day of the weak. Especially when Tua was healthy. Even Mac Jones was decent. Bama lost on quirky plays. I don't see any reason why taking the ball out of Jeudy, Smith or Waddle's hands would have improved Bama's chances. Sure there were TOs but they also made huge plays that you would lose the benefit of if you just ran the ball. For every TO or negative play Bama's receivers made you will probably find they made 5 big plays to counter it. The passing game isn't what hurt Bama. They simply lost to teams that are really good.My guess is that Saban is wishing he would have run the ball more and slung it around to the pencil necks a lot less and beaten Auburn.
Bama had multiple major injuries to LBs preseason, big reason for step back on D.I agree... the big TO's early in LSU game (Tua fumbled on scramble in opening drive), last year's Clemson game (pick 6 on opening drive) and plethora of them in Auburn game even with Tua are a big reason why Bama loses those games whereas in year's past they were not as prone to these TOs.
I honestly think the bigger issue is Bama's D has taken a step back is why they've lost the last 2 years more than anything. But I wonder if not being able to run/control the ball will also be considered by Saban why they've taken a step back teh last few years as well.