ADVERTISEMENT

$15 dollar hr minimum wage?

won't be anyone to tip. will be self service or served by robots.

hopefully cool sexy robots. but no more people.

people are overrated anyway.
Hope they have nice soft asses to pinch. No risk of lawsuit - at least I don't think so.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: awf
The reality of the situation is the cost of living has exploded and wages have not.
The pandemic makes any attempt to analyze this impossible. But if you look at wage increase vs. COLI increases for last 20 years, is what you say true? Don't know.

This:


as I read says wages & inflation have been pretty steady for 40 years, not getting worse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: awf
The economic theory that raising the minimum wage will result in higher unemployment and less growth is an incomplete theory unless you define the level of the increase.

Businesses may choose to absorb all or part of the increase in payroll costs or they may offset some or all by raising prices of goods and services but since the raises apply across the board no business gains any competitive advantage over another.

It isn't incomplete at all. You don't need a level of increase to know what will happen.

No business gains a competitive advantage over another? You think the mom and pops across the country have the means to stay afloat paying the same wage as your box chain who has the resources available to cover the increases?

Perfect analogy is what has happened right here in Lex during the draconian lockdowns of restaurants, especially when the recent one took place. BHG and a few others took advantage with tents, and others simply had to lock the doors for good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: awf
I almost hate to keep harping on this but here is another example of the unexpected consequences of raising minimum wages. Go into any Wal-Mart(s) or Kroger(s) and see how many “self-checkouts” they have. Every time I go to either of these places I’m amazed at the number of rubes who are standing in line to check their own purchases out.

There are only a few actual check out lines open, with actual paid employees, but there is always a gat dayum line at the self check out area. A whole bunch of people doing the work for free. Kroger(s) doesn't pay me to check out my groceries so why should I? Up that minimum wage to 15 an hour and you have little choice to check out your own purchases, to very little cost to the company, and to the detriment of the little old lady/college student/single parent that used to scan your items and quote you a price. You know, the ones that actually need a paycheck but have now been replaced because the costs just don’t add up.
I'll add that self-checkout is a lot less boring than standing there watching someone else do it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JumperJack and awf
This is a fact I have heard many of my construction clients saying the same thing. We are having problems hiring experienced people as well in the professions.

That being said, I don't mind paying an extra 10 or 20 cents for a hamburger if that will get more people working. And I take exception to those that say that $15 an hour is a living wage. Maybe in small town Kentucky, but definitely not on the coasts or any larger city in America
Where do you get a 75 cent hamburger these days? Whitey's?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: awf
Interesting. The biggest objectors to raising the minimum wage usually are people making the bigger bucks. Why is it that the raises given to the people making the least money is what drives up prices but the big money and perks paid to the executives is seen as irrelevant to prices?
It’s because businesses do the hiring and provide the jobs and can determine salaries. I would also say no tax breaks or corporate welfare should exist at the same time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: awf
Minimum wage jobs at one time were entry level jobs........It was a starting point.......not a job that anyone though they could stay at for the rest of your life.......what has changed is people for what ever reason are stuck in those jobs and are not climbing the ladder........but the want more money........
 

Just skimming through, 2.1% of the workforce, however 1.6% make below minimum wage, meaning 3/4 are restaurant servers that end up making more with tips usually so we’re talking about .5% of the workforce. And it says they are younger, more work part time, are single, without kids, and don’t vary in terms of ethnicity (meaning not more minorities).

It also says the minimum wage worker used to make up 13.4% of the workforce in the 70s, meaning the majority of businesses now pay more than minimum wage.

So we’re arguing about the 17 year old white kid working at McDs for the summer I guess? Who is it benefiting to pay him more? Who is it hurting? Is there even a point with so few people effected? Does this make it easier fir the single mother struggling to make ends meet that has been used as an example in this thread?
 
The economic theory that raising the minimum wage will result in higher unemployment and less growth is an incomplete theory unless you define the level of the increase.

If you went into Tupelo Mississippi today and raised the minimum wage to $20 and hour, I'm sure a lot of business would shut down and unemployment would spike, but what about raising it to say $10 or $11 and hour from the current $7.50? Businesses may choose to absorb all or part of the increase in payroll costs or they may offset some or all by raising prices of goods and services but since the raises apply across the board no business gains any competitive advantage over another. The counter argument is it's a wash because the increase in prices offset the increase in wages, but that is invalid. The increases in prices necessary to offset say a $3.00 increase in the wages could be just a few percent depending on the size of the business on a 30% increase in wages.

There have been studies done on this and in some instances raising the minimum wage actually results in an uptick in employment. If wages are raised the more money is in the hands of the consumers, that money get's spent which raises productivity, which intern results in more business formation or expansion and more hiring. That result might take a while to occur say on average a year but it does occur.

Some time back it was revealed the Wal Mart employees were often collecting government housing assistance, Medicaid and food stamps. So the taxpayer was effectively subsiding their payroll. Wal Mart has since initiated reforms to the employee compensation system to help eliminate that. So IMO there is a basic and fundamental principal at work regarding what employers should pay at a minimum, regarding full time adult workers not living at home, so that companies are fulling responsible for their payroll and not depending on the government (taxpayers).
principle

I hear ya, but unless you tell me how government is going to reduce spending because they've stopped these subsidies, it's an endless money pit. Unemployment went down when the $600/wk relief checks stopped. It's going back up with $300/wk checks that Biden plans to raise to $400. So what savings?
 
If you don't think the price of goods/services hasn't increased since the last minimum wage increase, I don't know what to tell you. The purchasing power of $7.25 isn't what it used to be. The idea that there doesn't need to be a raise in the minimum wage to accommodate that is insane.
Why does the min. wage concept even exit? No one forces anyone to work for $8/hr.
 
  • Like
Reactions: awf
It’s been that way a long time, at least back to the 90’s, that was in place when I waited tables. The owner of the restaurant talked about it and it’s on the Dept. of Labor website.
False

What is the federal minimum wage for tipped employees?
The federal minimum wage is currently $7.25 per hour. This is the lowest amount you can pay employees per hour of work. However, the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) makes an exception. Employers in certain industries can pay eligible employees (e.g., waiters) who receive tips a lower minimum wage than non-tipped workers.

Under federal law, tipped employees are those who regularly receive more than $30 per month in tips.

To pay tipped employees at a lower hourly rate, employers can claim a tip credit toward the federal minimum wage.

A tip credit reduces the hourly minimum wage for qualifying employees by the amount of the credit. The maximum tip credit employers can claim is $5.12 per hour.
 
I meant this mostly as a restaurant thing...give you an example. My buddies and I went on a baseball trip two summers ago to Pittsburgh, Cleveland and Detroit.
Pitt is my favorite stadium. Have done Cleve too. Several years back did a Wrigley/Brewers/WSox trip.
 
In theory, yes, but are there enough rungs up?

The reality of the situation is the cost of living has exploded and wages have not. There’s gonna be a ton of people subjected to deeper levels of poverty without some kind of action, and that in turn leads to a lot of other societal issues that wind up affecting everyone.

I have no idea if higher min wage is the answer, but the current scenario isn’t working too hot, either.

There are thousands, tens of thousands of unfilled skilled jobs, trade jobs.

The left as always thinks throwing money at it will fix it. But problems in family breakdown, culture, education all play a role in wages.
 
  • Like
Reactions: awf and phunterd
False

What is the federal minimum wage for tipped employees?
The federal minimum wage is currently $7.25 per hour. This is the lowest amount you can pay employees per hour of work. However, the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) makes an exception. Employers in certain industries can pay eligible employees (e.g., waiters) who receive tips a lower minimum wage than non-tipped workers.

Under federal law, tipped employees are those who regularly receive more than $30 per month in tips.

To pay tipped employees at a lower hourly rate, employers can claim a tip credit toward the federal minimum wage.

A tip credit reduces the hourly minimum wage for qualifying employees by the amount of the credit. The maximum tip credit employers can claim is $5.12 per hour.

True.

Tips
A tipped employee engages in an occupation in which he or she customarily and regularly receives more than $30 per month in tips. An employer of a tipped employee is only required to pay $2.13 per hour in direct wages if that amount combined with the tips received at least equals the federal minimum wage. If the employee's tips combined with the employer's direct wages of at least $2.13 per hour do not equal the federal minimum hourly wage, the employer must make up the difference. Many states, however, require higher direct wage amounts for tipped employees.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: awf
In theory, yes, but are there enough rungs up?

The reality of the situation is the cost of living has exploded and wages have not. There’s gonna be a ton of people subjected to deeper levels of poverty without some kind of action, and that in turn leads to a lot of other societal issues that wind up affecting everyone.

I have no idea if higher min wage is the answer, but the current scenario isn’t working too hot, either.

Welcome to the Democrat playbook . Make everyone and everything so miserable they think the Govt is their only savior . It’s playing out pretty much day by day right in front of our faces.
 
Just skimming through, 2.1% of the workforce, however 1.6% make below minimum wage, meaning 3/4 are restaurant servers that end up making more with tips usually so we’re talking about .5% of the workforce. And it says they are younger, more work part time, are single, without kids, and don’t vary in terms of ethnicity (meaning not more minorities).

It also says the minimum wage worker used to make up 13.4% of the workforce in the 70s, meaning the majority of businesses now pay more than minimum wage.

So we’re arguing about the 17 year old white kid working at McDs for the summer I guess? Who is it benefiting to pay him more? Who is it hurting? Is there even a point with so few people effected? Does this make it easier fir the single mother struggling to make ends meet that has been used as an example in this thread?

IMO because the min wage hasn't been raised since July of 2009, while the cost of living has risen considerably it simply has become impossible for employers to find and retain people to work at $7.50 and below. If you lifted the min wage than it would effect people making $8, $8.50 $9. per hour etc.

What should the rate be? conservative economics escalates the 2009 number of $7.25 to $8.70 using BLX indexes for cost of living, while liberal economists claim it should be $22.50 based on increases in production. In the meantime politicians have grabbed on a $15 figure which is based on going back to the original 1968 numbers when it was put in and escalated it forward to the present time.

As I said I think it should be based on the lowest cost of living area in the country and let other states, and local governments raise it more if they deem appropriate. By my way of thinking I think somewhere around $10 is the sweet spot.
 
There are enough rungs up if people take it upon themselves to “pull themselves up from the boot straps”. I guess my main point is that by implementing a minimum wage it sets a floor that no business will ever go above. Plus you completely glossed over the fact that a raised minimum wage will proportionately hurt those that is intended to help. Those on the lower rungs will be forced out by more qualified people that, in theory, will move on up only to be replaced by those waiting in the wings.

Also, and I think that this is something that has been criminally overlooked and not talked about, but one doesn’t need cable tv, internet, the newest cell phone, a car payment, etc, I.E LUXURIES to live.

Not everyone can have everything they want, fair or not. I want to drive a new BMW but it just isn’t in the cards. You want to have nice things then better your situation and trust me, it’s my own fault that I’m not driving that BMW. However, I’m doing pretty good.

Another thought i had was how badly are our poor people hurting in our country ? do they access to hot water / AC food shelter etc etc ? For the most part yes . As a guy who has earned everything I have , from farming tobacco , to cleaning dumpster bins at 16 , to working every weekend while in college , to owning a business I can’t really work up a cry for those that claim poverty and set around and watch Netflix 24/7 while drinking 12 sodas a day , and smoking 200 bucks in cigs a month . Call me whatever , don’t care . You want see mass pain and poverty , look to those countries with socialism and no social safety nets .
 
Well thank the sweet Lord we have Deeefense here to set market prices for us. What did we do before this grand genius bestowed his knowledge upon the world?
You certainly have strong opinions on this subject I can tell that!
 
  • Like
Reactions: awf
may have been said already. if you raise the minimum wage inflation will catch up so those people will be in the same place in 6-12 months. but in the mean time those making over $15 will lose purchasing power and be brought down to poverty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Phil_The_Music
These arguments are not new. In 1914 Henry Ford raised his workers to $5 a day, an unheard of sum at the time. But he did it so that his workers could afford to buy the cars he was making. Thus creating his own market which proved remarkably successful. As someone stated above raising the minimum wage mainly helps those at the very bottom rung. I don't see a huge problem with it. Maybe 15 is too high but something is in order.
 
Another thought i had was how badly are our poor people hurting in our country ? do they access to hot water / AC food shelter etc etc ? For the most part yes . As a guy who has earned everything I have , from farming tobacco , to cleaning dumpster bins at 16 , to working every weekend while in college , to owning a business I can’t really work up a cry for those that claim poverty and set around and watch Netflix 24/7 while drinking 12 sodas a day , and smoking 200 bucks in cigs a month . Call me whatever , don’t care . You want see mass pain and poverty , look to those countries with socialism and no social safety nets .
Don’t forget about unlimited internet access on their iPhone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: awf and ManitouDan
IMO because the min wage hasn't been raised since July of 2009, while the cost of living has risen considerably it simply has become impossible for employers to find and retain people to work at $7.50 and below. If you lifted the min wage than it would effect people making $8, $8.50 $9. per hour etc.

What should the rate be? conservative economics escalates the 2009 number of $7.25 to $8.70 using BLX indexes for cost of living, while liberal economists claim it should be $22.50 based on increases in production. In the meantime politicians have grabbed on a $15 figure which is based on going back to the original 1968 numbers when it was put in and escalated it forward to the present time.

As I said I think it should be based on the lowest cost of living area in the country and let other states, and local governments raise it more if they deem appropriate. By my way of thinking I think somewhere around $10 is the sweet spot.

Honestly, I doesn’t matter. Your stat was very eye opening. It’s .5% of the workforce. It won’t cause inflation because it doesn’t effect enough people like I thought. It doesn’t effect cost of living because the people making it aren’t paying for their living. It’s just a meaningless political talking point that gets people arguing while more important things get overlooked. So I’m bowing out of the conversation because it’s an insignificant action that doesn’t really effect anything or anyone.
 
Honestly, I doesn’t matter. Your stat was very eye opening. It’s .5% of the workforce. It won’t cause inflation because it doesn’t effect enough people like I thought. It doesn’t effect cost of living because the people making it aren’t paying for their living. It’s just a meaningless political talking point that gets people arguing while more important things get overlooked. So I’m bowing out of the conversation because it’s an insignificant action that doesn’t really effect anything or anyone.
I understand your point but there are a whole lot more than that making between $7.25 and $15 per hour, a lot more than a 1/2 of 1% of the workforce
 
  • Like
Reactions: awf
The economic theory that raising the minimum wage will result in higher unemployment and less growth is an incomplete theory unless you define the level of the increase.

If you went into Tupelo Mississippi today and raised the minimum wage to $20 and hour, I'm sure a lot of business would shut down and unemployment would spike, but what about raising it to say $10 or $11 and hour from the current $7.50? Businesses may choose to absorb all or part of the increase in payroll costs or they may offset some or all by raising prices of goods and services but since the raises apply across the board no business gains any competitive advantage over another. The counter argument is it's a wash because the increase in prices offset the increase in wages, but that is invalid. The increases in prices necessary to offset say a $3.00 increase in the wages could be just a few percent depending on the size of the business on a 30% increase in wages.

There have been studies done on this and in some instances raising the minimum wage actually results in an uptick in employment. If wages are raised the more money is in the hands of the consumers, that money get's spent which raises productivity, which intern results in more business formation or expansion and more hiring. That result might take a while to occur say on average a year but it does occur.

Some time back it was revealed the Wal Mart employees were often collecting government housing assistance, Medicaid and food stamps. So the taxpayer was effectively subsiding their payroll. Wal Mart has since initiated reforms to the employee compensation system to help eliminate that. So IMO there is a basic and fundamental principal at work regarding what employers should pay at a minimum, regarding full time adult workers not living at home, so that companies are fulling responsible for their payroll and not depending on the government (taxpayers).
How is it an incomplete theory?

If MW > equilibrium wage, them QS labor > QD labor. If MW < equilibrium wage, then no affect.
 
The pandemic makes any attempt to analyze this impossible. But if you look at wage increase vs. COLI increases for last 20 years, is what you say true? Don't know.

This:


as I read says wages & inflation have been pretty steady for 40 years, not getting worse.
There's a theory out there that the Fed's use of activist monetary policy is a contributing factor to real wages being sluggish.
 
  • Like
Reactions: awf
How is it an incomplete theory?

If MW > equilibrium wage, them QS labor > QD labor. If MW < equilibrium wage, then no affect.

Because if the increase is too excessive business will fold and layoffs will occur, but if the increase is moderate, most business will adjust their pricing, and/or choose to absorb the increase and stay in business, with the same level of staffing.
 
You can figure out a better way to help those at the bottom than just raising minimum wage, taxing the wealth out of the successful to give UBI or "free" healthcare or whatever other totally idiotic and poorly thought out ideas from the idealistic left.

You're basically just begging to be poorer, to feel good about yourself for doing nothing.

from1950s-4c2542146eca592b07c1f48e47e6efa49b1de976.jpg


images
 
Y’all remember that one time two months ago when we “voted out” the president that oversaw the largest adjusted wage gain for the bottom 20% in 40 years?

That was awesome.
What was the size of the "largest adjusted wage gain" for the bottom 20%?
 
Because if the increase is too excessive business will fold and layoffs will occur, but if the increase is moderate, most business will adjust their pricing, and/or choose to absorb the increase and stay in business, with the same level of staffing.
That obviously depends on some combination of the elasticity of labor demand and the amount of market power the firm has in the output market.
 
If minimum wage doubles, you are going to pay more than a few extra cents to get that burger. Also, your point reinforces why regional/state mandates work better than a national mandate. What works best for NYC likely won't be the best thing for Pikeville.

I believe at the end of the day this has as much to do with forcing inflation as anything else.

I trust your expertise on these matters as you're out in the business world, but I'm paying $10 for a combo meal right now. Where's that money going? It was 4 or 5 bucks at the start of the last decade.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT