There's a lot of interesting nuggets from this article. One thing that I think is important is the following:
Martin now says he gave athletic officials too much deference in accepting their version of events. He had only talked to one member of the faculty committee, former faculty athletic representative Jack Evans. Evans later told Wainstein he did not recall any discussion about lecture classes.
Former Senior Associate Athletic Director John Blanchard and Robert Mercer, the former academic support director for athletes, said in the Wainstein report they raised questions about AFAM lecture classes to the faculty committee. Wainstein found little evidence to back their claims.
I think this part cannot be overstated, and helps to explain how this investigation went off the rails from the get-go, and why this scandal has dragged year after year, with no end in sight.
I know that the NCAA has gone to a more cooperative stance with the schools expected to self-report and self-investigate, but that all hinges on the assumption that the leaders of the school hold some basic level of morality and accountability.
UNC has proven time and time again that they hold no such moral standards, and will literally lie, cheat and steal no matter how much it degrades their own reputation, as long as it preserves in their own mind a semblance of the facade that they'e spent so many decades trying to construct.
The NCAA made a huge mistake in trusting UNC to perform a legitimate investigation of this scandal, a mistake that they have continued to repeat multiple times, and frankly still haven't fully taken ownership over the investigation. They also made a huge mistake in taking the word of UNC athletic officials, coaches and administrators on anything with respect to this scandal.
At the end of the day, it's going to be the NCAA which will pay for these mistakes.